Showing posts with label Atlas Monks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atlas Monks. Show all posts

Monday 23 May 2011

Atlas Monks Christian-Muslim Love

Our Lady of Atlas Algeria

  http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/by-topic/john-w-kiser-christian-muslim-love/8476/

April 8th, 2011
John W. Kiser: Christian-Muslim Love
The recent opening across the United States of the much praised French film “Of Gods and Men” is an important event. As a fraternal love story wrapped in a horror story, it offers much reason for hope, as well as room for despair, depending on the lens of the viewer.
My lens is one of hope, based on six years of research and writing “The Monks of Tibhirine,” the book French director Xavier Beauvois called his “bible” for making his movie about Christian-Muslim friendship. My hope is also based on knowing the back story that goes untold in an otherwise excellent film focusing on the monks’ struggle to be true to their Trappist vows of poverty, charity, and stability when faced with their fear of a brutal death.
post01-christianmuslimlove
Some people today might say that Christian-Muslim love is an oxymoron. Yes, there are Muslims who preach hatred of the Christian West, even though fewer and fewer in the West (outside the US) are practicing or even professing Christians. There are no Muslims I have heard of who preach hatred or even disrespect for Jesus Christ, who is a much revered and sinless prophet in Islam.
There is, however, an active Christian minority that preaches hatred of Islam and regularly insults the Prophet Muhammad. Elements with political agendas on both sides benefit from blackening the other, and the media have been willing accomplices to this downward phobic spiral. “Of Gods and Men” is film that could help right perceptions.
Despite pleas in 1996 from both French and Algerian authorities to leave for a safer place when threatened by Islamic extremists, the monks remained at their remote monastery in Algeria’s Atlas Mountains out of deep sense of commitment to their extended family of villagers who depended on them for moral, medical, and material support. Like their neighbors, the monks trembled with fear at night. They argued among themselves: does the Good Shepherd abandon his flock when the wolves come? Does a mother abandon a sick, infectious child? Does their vow of poverty allow for them to flee to safer ground when their friends cannot?
When seven of the monks were kidnapped, it was not their neighbors who did it. Instead, it was a contract job that employed a group from outside the area to take the monks away from their dangerous situation—to be traded, in effect. But something went wrong along the way. Of one thing I am certain: killing them was not the plan. If that had been the case, they would not have been schlepped around the country for two months nor would negotiations for their release have taken place. Yet for some viewers, I suspect this will be seen as simply another “bad-Muslims-kill–good-Christians” story—exactly what the abbot of the monastery feared when he wrote his last testament, read at the end of the film.
The film works very well dramatically as a struggle between faith and fear. By necessity it leaves out important and broader story components. The tenacious commitment of Abbot Christian de Chergé (played by Lambert Wilson) to serve God in Algeria had been formed in him as a soldier serving in the French army during the Algerian war for independence from 1954 to 1962, when his life was saved by a Muslim friend, an Algerian policeman named Mohammed who faced down local rebels who wanted to shoot Christian one day when they were taking a walk—a time when they would discuss their faith.
That friendship cost the Algerian his life the next day. For Christian, Mohammed’s sacrifice was a gift of love reinforcing his belief that the spirit of Jesus Christ resides in all his children. For the rebels, the friend of my enemy is my enemy.
The film doesn’t have room to tell about the seventy-plus imams who, based on the same logic, were assassinated in the 1990s for denouncing what the terrorists were doing in the name of Islam. The terrorists themselves could show respect for the monks. In a dramatic scene in the film, Saya Attia, head of the terrorist group that intruded upon the monastery on Christmas Eve 1993 with demands for medical help, apologizes to Christian for disturbing their celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. Left out are the leader’s final words to Christian when he extends a hand in friendship: “We don’t consider you foreigners…you are religious.”
Nor does the viewer know that the tiny hamlet of Tibhirine was inhabited by families whose homes in the mountains had been bombed by the French during the war for independence. They had fled to the protection of the monastery, a holy place where the Christian “marabouts” (Arabic for religious teachers) sheltered them until they could build their own homes.
I have one regret about the film. It might have ended on a more positive note for Christian-Muslim relations by showing the genuine remorse of much of the Algerian population. Archbishop Henri Teissier of Algiers received sacks of letters from ordinary Algerians after the monks’ deaths were confirmed. The letters expressed a deep sense of solidarity with the monks as well as a sense of shame that was captured by this one: “No matter what has happened, we truly love you. You are part of us. We have failed in our duty—to protect you, to love you. Forgive us…You must accomplish your divine mission with us. I believe it is God’s plan.”
Universal fraternal love is the essence of Christianity and all true religion. Otherwise, religion degenerates into celestial nationalism. Christian himself frequently said that if religion doesn’t help us to live together, it is worthless.
The idea may seem laughably naïve in a post-9/11 world. Love, however, has nothing to do with sentiment and everything to do with good will, justice, empathy, and respect for others. Like their Savior, the monks’ lives were not taken. They were gifts of love.
John W. Kiser is the author of “The Monks of Tibhirine: Faith, Love, and Terror in Algeria” (St. Martins Press, 2002).

5 Responses to “John W. Kiser: Christian-Muslim Love”
  1. Brett says:
    “There are no Muslims I have heard of who preach hatred or even disrespect for Jesus Christ, who is a much revered and sinless prophet in Islam.”
    While this maybe true in some respects, the Koran teaches that Christ was a prophet among many rather than the Son of God. But beyond this theological dispute, the author is presenting the “tolerance” of Islam in speech while thousands of Christians are being slaughtered in their places of worship in Iraq, Egypt, Ethiopia…and on and on.
    This is not even regarding the oppression of Christian minorities in dozens of Muslim countries from the Kingdom of Saud to Pakistan to Iran.
    I agree with you about the movie; however, your insights on the tolerance of Islam on the ground with their Christian neighbors and countrymen, rather than in mere words in the Koran, is severely lacking critical context of the harsh reality.
  2. Henry Quinson says:
    Thanks for your comments John ! More on the movie in my latest book (in French) : ‘Secret des hommes, secret des dieux’, Presses de la Renaissance, prefaced by Xavier Beauvois, already Prix Spriritualités d’aujourd’hui 2011.
  3. F.CHESSEL says:
    Anyhow, this film is an amazing and huge gift to honor our seven brothers and moreover succeed to stir people here!!
    Choices were made, so repectfully!
    Thanks again to all the team!
  4. Faruq 'Abd al Haqq says:
    One of the points that should have emerged in the book, The Monks of Tibhirine, is the difference between Islam as a religion and Muslims as they do or do not practice their religion. Marshall Hodgson distinguished Christianity from Christendom, just as he distinguished Islam from Islamdom.
    The underlying question is whether there is a transcendent essence in either Christianity or Islam. Hans Kung wrote tomes on this question examining Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. He concluded that no religion exists as an essence and that every religion is the accumulation of contextual adaptation to the here and now. According to this theory, Islam is what Muslims do, including all that is universally recognized as violating global or any other kind of ethics, and regardless of the political, economic, and sociological factors as extenuating circumstances. Therefore Islam changes from one century to the next and from one country to another.
    Unfortunately, extremist Muslims, as well as extremist Christians and Jews, often have adopted a victim mentality, which can lead to arrogance, even though the scriptures of all world religions condemn arrogance as the worst of all sins, because it is incurable (only a humble person can admit one’s own arrogance).
    The monks of Tibhirine tried to follow a life of humility before God, as do most of the Sufi Muslims (though not all). Are they part of the essence of anything? This is addressed in my book, The Natural Law of Compassionate Justice, available on Amazon.
  5. Gerald Shenk says:
    John, congratulations for the way this story now plays out on big screens and with wide audiences. You sleuthed it long before the cameras came rolling through. It is a righteous parable of the better paths in interfaith relations, tragic griefs notwithstanding. We are finding the spirit of Jesus echoing and resonating in many new orbits, some far afield from the traditional paths of religious communities. Yet the classic appeal to human dignity amid differences is irresistibly attractive. Let us all take heart!
  Thanks for Web Log Post pbs org  

Tuesday 29 March 2011

Of Gods and Men Atlas Monks

 COMMENT
---- Forwarded Message ----
From: Sr. N....
Sent:
 Mon, 28 March, 2011 20:38:07
Subject: Re: Pope's Book
I like Donald's blog on discipleship, quoting from Benedict XV1's book "Jesus of Nazareth". 
Yours . . .
N....

At last some of us were able to view the award winning film of the Atlas Monks of the Cistercian Community of Our Lady of the Atlas, Algeria.
It was full house at the final showing at the Edinburgh Festival Film House.
After the fateful decision not to leave for France, Fr. Christian has the look of the anguish of responsibility as he walks out through the woods. As he comes to the lake, he reflects a sense of peace. Previously Christian had written, anticipating death, with love of his Muslim brothers and thanking God for all His children.
  • Later Br. Luc seemed to have acted ‘mine host for a celebration of the community decision of remaining in Algeria. He put on a tape to play the music of Swan Lake of Tchaikovsky. He served wine with a touch of elegance. It was a moving prolonged moment in the film, a moment of communion of brothers.. The facial expressions ranged the reactions of men pending assassination. 
  • The story gave a powerful account of the life of Cistercian monks and the insightful friendship with the village community.
  • “Why did they not leave?” was the question. One of the viewers could not understand, as also the Algerian Officials. In fact the villagers asked the monks them to stay to be their best protection from the terrorists.
  • This film is a unique picture of the life of the monks and of the poor Muslim villagers in the situation of constant threat and intense risk of life.
  • The film only touches on the controversial political background. The conclusion fades away in the snow suggesting a death march. 
  • One evening Vespers was dinned by a hovering helicopter with a large gun trained on the Church. It was a frightening experience shattering the quiet of the cloister. The monks moved out of their seats to the centre of the choir. They united their voices to sing a Hymn on light out of the darkness. They embraced together in courage. It was another moment of special communion. 
  • Artistically the armed helicopter was visually overpowering. It anticipated the reality in the actual killing of the monks in later weeks.  Information is piecing together on how the kidnapped monks were gunned down by an helicopter action in the hills.  

  • Atlas
  •  The possible sequel of this film will be a very different story. Unavoidably, the fate of the monks and the accurate account of their deaths will be a very painful, gruelling, and historically accurate. 
+ + + +

Prior to the capture of the monks, Dom Christian, the superior, wrote a testament to be opened and read if he died by violence. The text was opened on the feast of Pentecost, 26 May, shortly after the monks were killed.

Fr. Christian

If it should happen one day - and it could be today - that I become a victim of the terrorism which now seems ready to engulf all the foreigners living in Algeria, I would like my community, my Church and my family to remember that my life was GIVEN to God and to this country...

Testament of Dom Christian de Chergé
(opened on Pentecost Sunday, May 26, 1996)

Facing a GOODBYE....

If it should happen one day - and it could be today -
that I become a victim of the terrorism which now seems ready to engulf
all the foreigners living in Algeria,
I would like my community, my Church and my family
to remember that my life was GIVEN to God and to this country.
I ask them to accept the fact that the One Master of all life
was not a stranger to this brutal departure.
I would ask them to pray for me:
for how could I be found worthy of such an offering?
I ask them to associate this death with so many other equally violent ones
which are forgotten through indifference or anonymity.
My life has no more value than any other.
Nor any less value.
In any case, it has not the innocence of childhood.
I have lived long enough to know that I am an accomplice in the evil
which seems to prevail so terribly in the world,
even in the evil which might blindly strike me down.
I should like, when the time comes, to have a moment of spiritual clarity
which would allow me to beg forgiveness of God
and of my fellow human beings,
and at the same time forgive with all my heart the one who would strike me down.
I could not desire such a death.
It seems to me important to state this.
I do not see, in fact, how I could rejoice
if the people I love were indiscriminately accused of my murder.
It would be too high a price to pay
for what will perhaps be called, the "grace of martyrdom"
to owe it to an Algerian, whoever he might be,
especially if he says he is acting in fidelity to what he believes to be Islam.
I am aware of the scorn which can be heaped on the Algerians indiscriminately.
I am also aware of the caricatures of Islam which a certain Islamism fosters.
It is too easy to soothe one's conscience
by identifying this religious way with the fundamentalist ideology of its extremists.
For me, Algeria and Islam are something different: it is a body and a soul.
I have proclaimed this often enough, I think, in the light of what I have received from it.
I so often find there that true strand of the Gospel
which I learned at my mother's knee, my very first Church,
precisely in Algeria, and already inspired with respect for Muslim believers.
Obviously, my death will appear to confirm
those who hastily judged me naïve or idealistic:
"Let him tell us now what he thinks of his ideals!"
But these persons should know that finally my most avid curiosity will be set free.
This is what I shall be able to do, God willing:
immerse my gaze in that of the Father
to contemplate with him His children of Islam
just as He sees them, all shining with the glory of Christ,
the fruit of His Passion, filled with the Gift of the Spirit
whose secret joy will always be to establish communion
and restore the likeness, playing with the differences.
For this life lost, totally mine and totally theirs,
I thank God, who seems to have willed it entirely
for the sake of that JOY in everything and in spite of everything.
In this THANK YOU, which is said for everything in my life from now on,
I certainly include you, friends of yesterday and today,
and you, my friends of this place,
along with my mother and father, my sisters and brothers and their families,
You are the hundredfold granted as was promised!
And also you, my last-minute friend, who will not have known what you were doing:
Yes, I want this THANK YOU and this GOODBYE to be a "GOD-BLESS" for you, too,
because in God's face I see yours.
May we meet again as happy thieves in Paradise, if it please God, the Father of us both.
AMEN !   INCHALLAH !  

Algiers, 1st December 1993
Tibhirine, 1st January 1994 

Christian + 



Monday 7 February 2011

burnedthumb at Lúcháir: Of Gods and Men directed by Xavier Beauvois

Dear, Elizabeth,
I am delighted you were able view the film of the Atlas Monks in Stirling.
And it is icing on the cake of this gift of your Review.

 Fr Donald   http://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
 

1 comments:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D0Tr_7ErV64/S7BlpoG7nsI/AAAAAAAAATk/5KncluqwKQQ/S45/emr4.JPG
I went to see this film yesterday in Stirling. It was wonderful, I have the books you published about them and I was amazed at how closely it kept to the story as it emerged from the records at the monastery. And the final shot where monks and killers disappeared into the snow ---. I will be writimg about it on my blog today.Tibhirine

This is a first time I am availing of this Link up. I hope it works.

burnedthumb at Lúcháir: Of Gods and Men directed by Xavier Beauvois: "I went to see the film Of Gods and Men last night. Chretien de Chergé has been one of my heroes since his Testament was published. I'd put..."

Your own Blog,

LÚCHÁIR WEB-SITE

 is quite amazing.
Many thanks for your kindness and your great interest in the Atlas Brothers.
God bless.
fr. Donald

Of Gods and Men directed by Xavier Beauvois


Friday 4 February 2011

COMMENT on Previous Mystery of the Monks

Revisit of Nunraw Snow
Article on Investigative Progress;
Mystery of the Monks.
  



  FILM  

Subject: Of Gods and Men
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Donald - - -
Sent: Wed, 2 February, 2011 21:27:24
Subject: Re: Of Gods and Men Viewed R2
Dear, John,

  • I am delighted with your news.
  • It is great that you saw the film in Dublin.
  • Some people saw it in the Christmas time and then seemed to disappear.
  • Happily, in a letter today, I learn that one of the guests at the weekend heard about the viewing in the CAMEO in Edinburgh. She says that the "Of gods and of men" is one of the most powerful films I have seen in a long time. 
  • Then I hear of another family has seen the film in Edinburgh.

  • Your own response is very moving.
  • Thanks for letting us know.
  • The promise of obtaining the DVD is close to delivering.
  • My reading is sluggish but I happened upon an article in the Tablet, "MYSTERY OF THE MARTYRED MONKS", 4th December 2010. In contrast to the uncontroversial film, the article is investigative and trying but getting to the truth. 

Yours,
fr. Donald
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
E-mail from John - - -
To Donald


I had the great privilege of seeing “Of Gods and Men” this afternoon. I was spellbound for the entire film.

My sister, . . . came with me and told me afterwards she kept thinking as the story unfolded of her own time during the Civil War in Angola .

I am so proud of these martyrs just as I am proud of all the Cistercians I know, none more than my friends in Sancta Maria.
  
God bless you all.
John
+ + + 

 
    
Hi, Gerry,
Thank for the Email to learn that you saw the film, 'Of Gods and of Men'.  
It is good to know that the booklet, 'A Heritage Too Big For Us' Vol 1 is on-line. 
NEXT; you may be interested in the addition on the Blog article I missed in  THE TABLET.  
Yours . . .
Donald.
 PS. Disappointment with DVD delayed AMAZON UK to April 11th. Cancelled.
        Now ordered to France Amazon, assuring delivery 25 February.      

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: gerard - - -
To: donald - - -
Sent: Mon, 31 January, 2011 12:25:37
Subject: Film Glasgow?

Dom Donald

I thought I'd send a quick email to express to you my appreciation for what you have written on the Atlas Martyrs. 
I know you wrote it some time ago; however,  it was after going to see the film that I was moved to read more about your  brothers. Your article has been very helpful. I have particularly been impressed by the observation that when they were being taken away by their captors Br.  Michel took his cowl with him - impending death becoming prayer. 

Thank you for writing it. I am now heading for Dom Bernardo Olivera's book on the same.

Your sincerely
Gerry    

+ + +

Thursday 20 January 2011

Reviews of Atlas Monks Film Award and ARCHIVE "A Heritage Too Big For Us"



Reviews of Atlas Monks Film award -
Of Gods and Men, Des Hommes Et Des Dieux
Glasgow
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Andy . . .
To: Donald . . .Sent: Mon, 6 December, 2010 0:34:37
Subject:  Of Gods and Men Des Hommes et des Dieux
Dear Donald
Anne Marie and I have just returned from seeing the film of Gods and Men.  What a movie. Very sensitive to the spirituality of the life within the monastery. The setting depicted the very simplistic way of life of these monks and actors in no way detracted from the sensitive nature of the build up to the kidnapping of the seven martyrs. 

The movie was very spiritual, prayerful and at parts very emotional especially after the community had decided to remain in the monastery and during the community meal one of the monks opened bottles of wine and played a recording from Swan Lake - a very moving part of the story as each member of the community realised what lay ahead of them

The sensitivity of the Cistercian way of life was very evident in the singing of the psalms, in the celebration of the Eucharist and in the Salve Regina. On looking a some of the photographs of the Atlas Martyrs it is amazing how the actors chosen to portray the monks resembled them. A film well worth seeing.

God bless
Andy

Amazon US 
5.0 out of 5 stars 
Brothers of Tibhirine,
11 Dec 2010
By  Benedict – 
Movie Review
Of Gods and Men OST (Des Hommes et des Dieux) (Audio CD)
After seeing this film I was moved by the very carefully selected music used as assist in the understanding of the spiritual, emotional and prayerful depth of the real life story of the Atlas Martyrs. The use of Latin and French text in the singing aids the listener, or viewer of the film, to become involved in the prayerful atmosphere portrayed within the Cistercian monastery. The musical climax of the movie is the background playing of Swan Lake as the community share their "Last Supper". A movie worth seeing and a soundtrack worth listening too.
 

Glasgow
---- Forwarded Message ----
From: Anne Marie . . .
To: nunraw Donald . . . .
Sent: Mon, 6 December, 2010 21:42:56
Subject: Movie review

Well, the film is more than you would expect. When it comes to monasticism I wondered if they would be able capture it.
They did it by not being afraid to be silent and to allow the
chant to do its work.  It seemed to bring you to the heart of the matter, something mysterious and wonderful. 
The relationship between the community and the village was a true bond despite religious differences and obviously a very important focus.
I won't spoil any more for you.  I was deeply moved by the film due to its simplicity.
Anne Marie
Dublin
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Noreen . . .
To: Donald. . .
Sent: Tue, 28 December, 2010 20:58:32
Subject: Re: Movie review
Jo and I managed to see the film "Of Gods and men" on the 13th Dec. at the Irish Film Institute in Dublin.  They show award winning films from other countries.  It was shown in a smallish cinema, which was full that afternoon.  A lady next to me said there were so many coming that they were going to transfer it to a larger cinema within their complex.  It was shown for a full month.  Unfortunately, it is not showing in the larger cinemas in the city.
Jo and I really enjoyed it very much and found it easy to follow the French with English dubbing.  It is rare to see such a beautiful presentation of Religious life.  Having so much background knowledge from you both was of course helpful.  It is great to read such positive reviews also.
. . .
Noreen.

Edinbugh
The film Of Gods and Men Des Hommes et des Dieux  was in Edinburgh.
Friends, who saw it, were gripped by the whole presentation.
Another friend hurried to view the last showing and regretfully could not get place even among the standing.

Leeds
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: John . . .
To: Donald . . .
Sent: Tue, 18 January, 2011
Subject: RE: Leeds cinema.
Dear Fr Donald,

Thank you so much for your kind email and the attachment. I was delighted to be able to print the copy of volume 1 of “A Heritage Too Big for Us” from the online version you sent. I’ve long had and interest in the Atlas Martyrs ever since reading John Kiser’s account. Their martyrdom has come to new appreciation through the film ‘Of Gods and Men’ which I saw twice in Leeds. I found it immensely moving.
Yours . . 
John


Peter from Leicester spoke to us about how riveting and impressive silence at the end of the showing. 
Other Emails and Letters came from UK and came friends in France to tell us of their pleasure to see the film on the Atlas Monks.


Our anticipation awaits the availability of the DVD. 
The Amazon provider disappointed us by supplying the CD Audio ONLY,
and then failed completely to offer the DVD Of Gods and Men, Des Hommes Et Des Dieux.
Perhaps it may find the DVD through www.amazon.fr/dvd-dvds-doccasion-imports...tv/b?


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

RESOURCE.
An Archive of the background of the seven monks of Atlas, Algeria.
For those who wish to read more on our book on-line here.


A Heritage Too Big For US

Atlas Martyrs
Vol 1. edited by
Donald McGlynn, ocso


On May 21, 1996, seven monks of the Cistercian-Trappist monastery of Our Lady of Atlas in Algeria died by assassination at the hands of terrorists: Fr. Christian de Chergé, Br. Luc Dochier, Fr. Christophe Lebreton, Br. Paul Favre-Miville, Br. Michel Fleury, Fr. Bruno Lemarchand, and Fr. Célestin Ringeard.
In my heart a single phrase was resounding: “We will not leave our dead alone, we shall come back!” (Dom Bernardo Olivera, OCSO)[1]
 From the beginning the General Chapter has been marked by the luminous witness of our brothers of Atlas who have reminded us of the meaning, the value, and the fecundity of a cenobitic life in the radical following of Christ, rooted in the local Church, responsible for a particular people, open to dialogue between religions and cultures. (Message of the General Chapter of 1996)[2]
Tibhirine was for us an icon of our vocation as Christians seeking God in the land of Algeria, that is to say in a Muslim land. . . . I think there is no other monastery in the world which has such a general relationship with the members of the local Church. Most of the priests, religious men and women, as well as the laity living permanently in the diocese, had a personal bond with the community. (Mgr. Henri Teissier, Archbishop of Algiers)[3]
I had hardly arrived in their house, so poor and welcoming at the same time, when deep within me, coming I know not from where, I had the powerful feeling that the true monks of today were right there. And I remembered the words of Jean Baptiste Metz: that the religious life can no longer be understood away from that precariousness which tells of its openness to the eschatological. (Fr. Philippe Hémon, Tamié)[4]

Chronology

March 27–May 21 Fifty-six days of abduction.

March 27
Abduction of seven monks in their monastery of Our Lady of Atlas, Tibhirine.
March 28
Paris demands that Algeria put all its forces into operation to free them.
April 14
Pope John Paul II, in Tunisia, declares that his thoughts “turned first of all” to the seven Trappists.
April 25
The aman, the protection of the previous emir, is revoked. The GIA justify their kidnapping of the monks “still alive” and demand of President Chirac “an exchange of your prisoners for our prisoners.”
April 28
More than 2000 people pray in Notre Dame in Paris with the leaders of different religions.
April 30
The French ambassador receives an audio cassette confirming that the monks are still alive, as well as a letter laying down the conditions for negotiation.
May 1
A day of prayer is observed world-wide in Cistercian monasteries.
May 7
In Paris, Muslim leaders issue a letter to the kidnappers condemning their action as a violation of Islamic precepts.
May 9
The French authorities affirm that they will not negotiate with the GIA.
May 21
The GIA affirm: “We have cut the throats of the seven monks.”
May 27
Pentecost. Testament of Fr. Christian is opened. “Words to inspire the world” give keynote to reflections on the events.
May 30
Cardinal Léon-Étienne Duval dies at ninety-two. The remains of the seven monks are found. Abbot General Bernardo Olivera arrives in Algiers.
June 2
Cardinal Arinze preaches panegyric at Mass in Algiers for the seven monks and Cardinal Duval.
June 4
Transfer of remains by seven military ambulances to Tibhirine. Burial of the seven monks surrounded by mourning Muslim neighbors.
July 16
Reported assassination of Djamel Zitouni by other rebels.
August 1
Bishop Pierre Claverie of Oran is killed by a bomb on his own doorstep.
October 5
 Fr. Jean-Pierre addresses the General Chapter on “Present Situation of Atlas.”
October 12
At Tre Fontane, Rome, Archbishop Teissier preaches at Mass of General Chapter. Pope sends message from hospital.
    

Abduction: March 26–27, 1996

Among those who lived through the events of the forced entry of the GIA terrorists (Armed Islamic Group) and the abduction of seven monks on the night of March 26–27, 1996, were three eyewitnesses who wrote accounts of what happened.[5] Fr. Jean-Pierre was the porter of the monastery, who observed some of the activities of that night. Fr. Amadeus’s room was close to the medical supplies, which diverted attention from his locked door. The third witness was one of twelve members of the Ribât group staying in the guest quarters. They were fortunate to remain undetected. Each became aware of what was happening in his own way. It is remarkable that so much could have been going on, within the same walls, without everyone’s being alerted. A clear, composite picture of events emerges from the independent accounts of these witnesses.
At the midday hour of March 26, 1996, the community Mass was celebrated as usual. As the brothers heard the Gospel of the day, they could not have anticipated the manner in which the words from John 8:21–30, “I am going away and you will seek me,” were to be realized tragically in seven of them that very night.
At 5:30 p.m., the end of the working day, the time people stopped coming to the dispensary, Fr. Jean-Pierre locked up for the night. The Security Services had been insisting on early closing for some time. At 1:15 a.m., Fr. Jean-Pierre, sleeping in the porter’s room next to the entrance, was awakened by the sound of voices. Remaining concealed, he made out two or three persons speaking in Arabic and immediately realized it could only be the “brothers from the mountain” who had somehow gained access to the cloister. A man with a tommy-gun joined the others. From another angle Jean-Pierre saw a turbaned figure, also with a tommy-gun slung across his shoulder, making an entrance near Br. Luc’s room; conversation was low and there was no violence, so he did not realize the gravity of the situation. He had not heard the doorbell and therefore assumed that Fr. Christian had forestalled him and had taken matters in hand just as he had done on that all too acutely remembered forced entry of Christmas Eve, 1993. He had no idea that some twenty terrorists were deployed. He felt it wiser not to show himself and prayed anxiously for them to go away. The thought of death and martyrdom had often occurred to him but not the possibility of being taken hostage. He heard someone ask “Who is the chief?” and a reply, “That’s him, the chief. You must do what he tells you,” followed by comings and goings in the entrance hall. Then silence, and the sound of the street door being closed. He thought Christian had sent the intruders away. He went to go to the bathroom before returning to bed. The lights had been turned off; everything seemed in order, except for some clothing scattered about. He wondered, “Did they ask for some clothing that they did not like and threw there on their way out?” Everything else seemed normal. There was nothing more to be done. Jean-Pierre did not know that the lights had been turned off by Fr. Amadeus.
Fr. Amadeus had been awakened by noise that made him think of Br. Luc looking for medicines, except that Luc would not be so rough. He could then hear voices but not Luc’s familiar asthmatic cough. Someone tried his door. It was locked and the intruders seemed to turn their attention back to the medicine cartons. Amadeus used his torch to check his watch. It was 1:15 a.m. He dressed silently. The figures were too close to the door for him to see much through the keyhole as they continued to ransack the medicine stores. After activities had stopped, he eased his door open. The lights were on. Everything was in disarray. In the adjoining room of Br. Luc, medicines and books were on the floor. The new little radio had gone. Expecting the worst, he rushed to Fr. Christian’s office, where Christian had been sleeping recently in order to be near those at the entrance. There also everything was turned upside down, the electric typewriter and camera had disappeared, and the telephone had been removed. Of Fr. Christian and Br. Luc there was no sign.
“What about the guests?” It was at this point that he quickly extinguished the lights and hurried to find out about the twelve members of the Ribât who were in the guest rooms near the community bedrooms. The doors of the monks’ rooms all lay open, lights on, everything scattered about and the brothers gone. In great fear for the guests he continued along the passage through the enclosure door to the guest quarters. There everything was quiet. The night-lights were on and the bedroom doors closed. He knocked on the first door. He found the occupant wide awake and waiting, having been roused earlier by another guest in the group. The two listened in alarm. They thought they heard Célestin’s voice among others and supposed he might have taken ill and that the brothers wanted to move him downstairs, or might have wanted to take him to the hospital, but that was impossible in the night. Boldly, one of the two half-opened the monks’ enclosure door. They knew immediately that the terrorists had come again. When at last there was silence and the hallway was empty, they still could not risk making themselves conspicuous or try to escape by the external stairs, fearing that armed men were still around. They decided to return to their rooms.
The intruders made a quick departure. Did they think they had their full catch of hostages after they had rounded up seven of the monks? They would not have known that two monks, Br. Paul and Fr. Bruno, had arrived just that previous evening, another indication of a premeditated kidnapping. Police findings showed that taxis had been requisitioned at the village of Ain Elrais. These were later found abandoned. After that the kidnappers seem to have used mules to cover their trek into hiding in the mountains.
 As the guest in the room nearest the monks’ enclosure waited in his bed with thoughts of death, listening for further sounds, Fr. Amadeus appeared with a torch saying, “Are you there? The monastery is empty. There isn’t a single father left!” Together they began their search. The guest noticed that Br. Paul’s room was littered with the wrappings of gifts and sweets he had just brought back for Easter. He noticed one box left untouched because, he guessed, the chocolates contained alcohol. He later placed these in the refrigerator to await the return of the brothers. A large cheese was likewise left lying near the statue of Our Lady, because it had the large Savoy Cross on the Tamié wrapping. In the kitchen, refectory, and cloister they found little disturbed, except that the telephone line had been cut. They went toward the porter’s room. “Jean-Pierre, it’s Amadeus, are you there?” To their great relief Jean-Pierre, fully dressed, opened the door with his usual peaceful smile. They told him, “We are the only ones here, all the others have been taken away.”
The first thing to do was to contact the Security Services, but the telephone lines had been cut. It was later found that the wires had been severed fifteen kilometers away, another mark of a well-planned raid. They went to the nearest house with a phone, only to discover that they could not make a call. The family was terribly frightened, and Fr. Jean-Pierre stayed awhile to comfort and encourage them.
By 3:00 a.m. nothing more could be done, and it was decided to rest until the office of Vigils. Amadeus said he had not finished the rosary he had begun while the others were out. Together they completed the prayer. “Amadeus radiated an extraordinary peace,” the guest noticed. As arranged, they began Vigils at 5:15, three guests feeling honored to hold the place in choir of the abducted brothers, as best they could. It was thus in the chapel that the other Ribât members, nine sisters, found them.
At dawn there was an unusual silence. The call of the muezzin did not mingle with the sound of the monastery bell. It seemed that the villagers already knew of the attack and were fearful. The twenty or so faithful who normally came to the mosque, part of the monastery building, for dawn prayer did not come. Fr. Jean-Pierre and one of the guests drove off through the mist and arrived at the police station at Médéa at 7:15 a.m. The commandant was on the point of setting off on a planned operation but gave them his full attention. He immediately contacted his superiors and obtained authorization to inform Archbishop Teissier, the French Ambassador, and the Algerian Press Service. All was conducted in Arabic and with surprising alacrity.
Ten members of the Ribât group departed for Algiers in two cars. One had to wait for other transport. Another decided to stay with Jean-Pierre and Amadeus that night. The group reassembled at the Diocesan Center, “in communion with our wounded Church and at the same time conscious that, as Sr. Jean-Marie said, our brothers were living or were already in the light of God, and it was for us to watch with them. This is why we felt it right to continue our programme.”[6]
During the day a contingent of police and then a detachment of soldiers came to investigate. When they began to enter the cloister they were stopped by the guest who asked them to stay at the entrance, using the words of Fr. Christian on an earlier occasion: “This is a place of prayer and of peace. We do not enter it with arms.” In each case the armed men respected this situation. In the evening Jean-Pierre and Amadeus accepted the military instructions and were guests at a hotel in Médéa for that night. The Ribât guest accompanied them and admired how Jean-Pierre and Amadeus, in their rough jackets and woolen bonnets, spoke with their usual simplicity and peacefulness to the hotel manager, the head of the prefecture, the chief of police, and everyone who welcomed them and wanted to fuss over them.[7]

History of Cistercian Monks (Trappists) in Algeria 1843–1904, 1934–97[8]

The fate of the Cistercian monks of Our Lady of Atlas at Tibhirine, like the many Trappists who completed their special religious calling in Algeria before them, is marked by its Cistercian character. The present Constitutions of the Order, approved as recently as 1990, express the exceptional nature of certain communities living in non-Christian environments: “In God’s providence monasteries are holy places not only for those who are of the household of the faith, but for all persons of good will” (ST 30.B). North Africa has always been exceptional, because it has held little hope of local recruitment, and more especially because it has provided the need for a Christian presence of a purely spiritual character in a non-Christian milieu.
The lives of the young monks who died in the early years of Staouëli[9] are remembered not for anything they had to do with the forces of political power of French colonization, which differed so much from those of the conflict of Algerian Independence, but for the uncompromising pursuit of their own monastic vocation of silence, prayer, and labor.
The commendable achievements attributed to the monks for a number of good reasons—their contributions in agriculture, education, evangelism, and medicine—may be a credit to them but are extrinsic to their real aim. These achievements demonstrate both the reality of the social, religious, and political conditions and how little these impinge upon the life of the anonymous monk following the simple Cistercian vocation of austerity and prayer. The lot of the Atlas monks in 1996 was apparently at the mercy of external circumstances, as was that of their predecessors at Staouëli in the previous century, and at the same time distinctive in the primacy of its spiritual goal and faithfulness to that goal alone.