Monday, 14 April 2008

Children's Hospital


Charles McNeil - Past Resident at Nunraw known for his work in the Children’s Hospital, Edinburgh.

Abbot Raymond received this interesting inquiry regarding the late Professor Charles McNeil.

“I wonder if you might be able to help with some information on the above who had, I believe, some links with Nunraw Abbey? I have the specific task of tracking down information on Prof McNeil, who was appointed to its first Chair [the first to be devoted to the study of the child in health as well as in sickness] in 1931, a post he held until retirement in 1946. The fairly brief biographical information which I have obtained so far indicates that, in the years following his retirement, Prof & Mrs McNeil lived in the Gifford area and had contact with the Abbey, certainly until the former's death in 1964. We are keen to obtain some information
about this time in his life. To this end, I wonder if the Abbey and its Community might be able to furnish some information which could assist us in our task”.

The response to this inquiry is that “All you wanted to ask about Charles McNeill and were afraid to ask”, can be readily found – or at least a good part of it.

To begin at the end, I have just taken a photo of the memorial stone, (the boulder brought from a Galloway river bed at the wish of Charles), in the cemetery at old Nunraw House. At that time of the evening the view was rather remarkable, showing the long shadows of the tree overhanging the grave. The story of the stone is that one of the requests in Charles’ Will was to have this bolder brought from one of the many stream beds in Galloway. This mission was carried out by Adam, driver and gardener at Nunraw Barns, and Seamus, stone worker at the Abbey, who made the long drive to bring home this link with his forebears in the Rhinns of South West Scotland.

Engraved on the chosen monument are the exact dates of birth and life, 1881-1964.

His wife, Alice Workman McNeil, was also buried here.

In the Nunraw library the most helpful record for the purposes of research must be the privately printed, “A Scottish Physician, Charles McNeil, An Appreciation by George Scott-Moncrieff”. It is an illustrated 23 page monograph.

Extract from George Scott-Moncrieff’s “A Scottish Physician”.

An original member of the British Paediatric Association, Charles McNeil was elected its President in 1941, and was also President of the Scottish Paediatric Association. He was elected President of the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh, 1940-1943, and was made a Fellow of the London College in 1943. He became a member of the Governing Board of the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, and on his retirement in 1946 the University conferred the title of Emeritus Professor on him and gave him an LL.D. in 1953. During the war years, 1939-1945, Professor MeNeil was engaged in helping with the plans then going ahead for the National Health Service.

- - -

Charles McNeil died at Nunraw Barns on April 27th, 1964, peacefully, after receiving the Last Sacraments.

Many tributes, both public and private, were paid to this "true physician and erudite scholar" as the obituary in the British Medical Journal described him, adding the singular praise "he was incapable of a mean or unkind thought." Intellectually "he had a gift for the rapid assessment of a clinical problem," but perhaps even more important was the gentle loving approach that gave him the immediate confidence of children. A young man remembered meeting him as a child, the warmth and ease with which the Professor spoke to him, and the humility and perception that made an elderly man capable of seeing a child's problems as they appear to the child himself, so that he was able to offer acceptable advice and encouragement. His gracious manner, radiant smile and delightful sense of humour, remain fresh in the memories of many of us who knew him and who would not hesitate to describe Charles McNeil as a saintly man.

Charles McNeil was given the rare tribute of burial amongst the Cistercian monks in the monastic cemetery. In his funeral oration Abbot Columban Mulcahy of Nunraw said that this was a man who might have made his own the words, " Look for me in the nurseries of heaven." (Francis Thomson).

The portrait of Charles McNeil was painted in 1948 by his cousin Murray Urquhart. It would be interesting its final location.

For further reference, see also Lectures as, e.g. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, LONDON SATURDAY MARCH 6 1954, YESTERDAY AND TO-MORROW IN CHILD HEALTH. BY CHARLES McNEIL, MD., LL.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.C.P.Ed. Professor Emeritus in Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh. WWWeb. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=2084750&pageindex=1

The story of Alice Workman-McNeil is on a par with that of her husband. They met through their heroic work in Rouen during the 1914-18 War. Charles was in command of the hospital, mostly under tent, which at one time saw forty thousand casualties brought in.
Alice was one of two sisters from Northern Ireland who arrived in France, bringing their own money to initiate voluntary help to the troops. Alice Workman started four canteens for Servicemen in Rouen and managed them throughout the war. In January, 1919, Charles McNeill and she were married in St. Helen’s Bay Presbyterian Church in county Down”.

The loveliest comment on the life’s work of Charles McNeil is his own sense of wonder in the first smile of the child. This humble Pediatrician appreciated to the full his privileged profession expressed in his key direction in the Children’s Hospital. “He always regarded the first smile of a sick child as a matter of major importance, and a large red S had to be written on its chart to record the occasion”.

What is the glorious experience of parents in that first smile is something to move everyone to thank God for the wonder of our being.

Ps. 138(139).
For it was you who created my being,
knit me together in my mother’s womb.
I thank you for the wonder of my being,
for the wonders of all your creation.

+ + + + + + + + + + + +

Sunday, 13 April 2008

I am the good shepherd

THE GOOD SHEPHERD

It is hard not to think that Jesus has got his metaphors a bit mixed up when we consider what he tells us in today’s Gospel. (“I am the good shepherd” (Jn 10:11).

He starts with the image of a Sheepfold. Then he speaks of the Gate of the Sheepfold; then of the Shepherd who enters through the Gate; then of the Gatekeeper who lets the Shepherd in.

He then switches back to the image of the Shepherd who leads the flock but, in his explanation to his uncomprehending listeners, he suddenly jumps back again to the image of the Gate: “I tell you solemnly, I am the Gate of the sheepfold.” “Anyone who enters through me will be safe: He will go freely in and out and be sure of finding pasture.”

It is only after all this that Jesus explicitly applies the image of the Shepherd directly to himself. He finally says: “I am the Good Shepherd who lays down his life for his sheep….I know my own and my own know me.”

In summary, the Lord would seem to be implying that the basic picture is of His Heavenly Father being the Gatekeeper; He himself being the Gate, and his ministers down the centuries being the Shepherds who pass through the gate but who do so only as his own representatives, for ultimately he alone is both the Gate and the one and only True Good Shepherd.

This brings us to consider this morning the tremendous privilege we have in knowing Him and being called to follow Him who is the only true Gate to eternal life.

All other faiths have their own image of God; their own attitude towards God, more or less true. But no other Faith can give the knowledge of God that comes to us through our Faith in the Son of God incarnate; Jesus, our Brother in the flesh. What a difference that makes. We can hardly imagine what it must be like to have no other image of God and of our relationship with him than the image that still persists in Islam or even in Judaism. And how many millions, and indeed billions, of souls does that include!

We can only cry out with St Paul to the Philippians:

“Because of Christ, I have come to consider all these advantages I had as disadvantages. Not only that, but I believe that nothing can happen that will outweigh the supreme advantage of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For him, I have accepted the loss of everything, and I look on everything as so much rubbish if only I can have Christ and be given a place in him.

Abbot Raymond. Morning Chapter Talk

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Saturday, 12 April 2008

Good Shepherd Sunday

World Day of Prayer for Vocations

Cardinal Keith O’Brien takes his queue from
POPE BENEDICT XVI’s Message for the 45th World Day of Prayer for Vocations, 13 APRIL 2008,Fourth Sunday of Easter.

Theme: “Vocations at the service of the Church on mission”

The Cardinal quotes, “The Church is missionary in herself and in each one of her members. Through the sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation, every Christian is called to bear witness and to announce the Gospel”, and he goes on to view the local panorama of the Church embodying the Vocations of his people in the Archdiocese.

The Holy Father himself extends the spiritual and ecclesial horizons of the Christian community.

It is worth reading his whole text,

He begins his message by recalling Jesus’ Great Commission to the Apostles (Mt. 28:19-20) to take the message of the Gospel to the ends of the earth. He then traced this mission back to its origins in the call of God to the prophets. The way the Gospel is transmitted today remains the same as in the time of the Apostles. “In the beginning, and thereafter, what ‘impels’ the Apostles is always ‘the love of Christ’. (...) In fact, the love of Christ must be communicated to the brothers by example and words, with all one's life.”

This double loop, from the Apostles near ground level to the heights of the love of Christ, seems to be the Pope’s style, as in the next double loop. For example, on the occasion of the multiplication of the loaves, he said to the Apostles: “You give them something to eat” (Mt 14: 16), encouraging them to assume the needs of the crowds to whom he wished to offer nourishment, but also to reveal the food “which endures to eternal life” (Jn 6: 27).

“The promises made to our fathers were fulfilled entirely in Jesus Christ. In this regard, the Second Vatican Council says: “The Son, therefore, came, sent by the Father. It was in him, before the foundation of the world, that the Father chose us and predestined us to become adopted sons … To carry out the will of the Father, Christ inaugurated the kingdom of heaven on earth and revealed to us the mystery of that kingdom. By his obedience he brought about redemption” (Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium,”

This same heavenly grid is evident where Benedict XVII quotes his two predecessors.

“My venerable predecessor John Paul II wrote: “The special vocation of missionaries ‘for life’ retains all its validity: it is the model of the Church's missionary commitment, which always stands in need of radical and total self-giving, of new and bold endeavours”. (Encyclical Redemptoris Missio, 66)

This multitude of men and women religious, belonging to innumerable Institutes of contemplative and active life, still plays “the main role in the evangelisation of the world” (Ad Gentes, 40). With their continual and community prayer, contemplatives intercede without ceasing for all humanity. Religious of the active life, with their many charitable activities, bring to all a living witness of the love and mercy of God.

The Servant of God Paul VI concerning these apostles of our times said: “Thanks to their consecration they are eminently willing and free to leave everything and to go and proclaim the Gospel even to the ends of the earth. They are enterprising and their apostolate is often marked by an originality, by a genius that demands admiration. They are generous: often they are found at the outposts of the mission, and they take the greatest of risks for their health and their very lives. Truly the Church owes them much” (Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi, 69).

“Vocations to the ministerial priesthood and to the consecrated life can only flourish in a spiritual soil that is well cultivated. Mission, as a witness of divine love, becomes particularly effective when it is shared in a community, “so that the world may believe” (cf. Jn 17: 21).

The Church prays everyday to the Holy Spirit for the gift of vocations.”

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Thursday, 10 April 2008

Nunraw trial Video

This is a trial in using the Video facility of this BLOG


Wednesday, 2 April 2008

Adam, where are you?

A TALE OF TWO GARDENS

The Books of Holy Scripture are full of twin stories, Diptychs; sometimes with one story in the Old Testament relating to one in the New, e.g. Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac vis-à-vis God the Father’s sacrifice of Jesus; sometimes with both stories in the same Testament; e.g. The two miraculous catches of fish in the Gospels, or the Deliverance of Israel, first from Egypt and then from Babylon in the O.T. Sometimes the two stories are thousands of years apart e.g. The Passion and Death of Samson in the O.T. and the Passion and Death of Christ in the N.T.;

Sometimes the stories are immediately one after the other as with the stories of the Annunciation and Birth of John the Baptist and the Annunciation and Birth of Jesus.

In every case, however, the first story is a key to the understanding of the second. The second story is coloured and enriched by its association with the first.

So, with this in mind, let us take one of these Diptychs and try to draw all we can of the Divine Author’s meaning from it. God is, after all, the supreme dramatist. Before him all the Cicero’s and Dante’s and Shakespear’s of the world pall into insignificance.

Moreover, where these great human authors can only write with words on paper or parchment God can dip his finger into the ink-well of his creative power and write real historic scenes with real live characters on the pages of history itself in order to convey his message to us.

The great Diptych I would like to consider here is the Diptych which places the story of the Garden of Eden, the Garden of the Fall, and the story of the Garden of Christ’s Tomb, the Garden of the Resurrection, side by side.

In the Garden of the Fall, God appears as the Heavenly Father, the Creator of Mankind.

In the Garden of the Resurrection, God appears as Christ, the Redeemer of Mankind.

In the Garden of the Fall God calls out to his fallen creature: “Adam, where are you?” Now, it becomes apparent as we study the parallels of this Diptych, that this is no angry cry of an offended Deity, but rather the heartfelt cry of a Father who has lost his son.

God’s cry of “Adam, where are you?” in the Garden of the Fall is contrasted with Magdalene’s cry in the Garden of the Resurrection: “Where is he? They have taken away my Lord!

In the first Garden it is God who is seeking man; in the second Garden it is man who is seeking God. The balance is at last restored.

And how fitting it was that it should be Mary Magadalene who represents fallen man seeking his God; she who was sin personified, as it were; she, out of whom seven devils had been cast. She had seen it all, done it all. How beautiful that the Risen Christ should therefore first appear to her – she who was first, the personification of sinful man, and then, the personification of the repentant sinner.

In the first Garden it is man who is hiding from God, in the second Garden it is God who is hiding from man.

Jesus plays a game of ‘hide and seek’ with Magdalene and by his questioning: “Why do you weep? Who are you looking for?” he draws from her the expression of her desire for him: “They have taken away my Lord and I don’t know where the have laid him.”

Then finally, and so beautifully, the scene climaxes in Jesus calling her by her name: “Mary” and at this she recognises him and clings to him with unspeakable joy. In this, so beautiful way, calling her by name, Jesus gives us a sign and a symbol of the utter love with which he forgives and takes us back to himself.

And so the scene of the First Garden is reversed and all things are restored to what they ought to be – Repentant Man seeking and finding his God again.

Abbot Raymond
+ + + + + + + + + + +

Monday, 31 March 2008

Nunraw Annunciation




Annunciation of the Lord

Solemnity transferred to Mon. 31 March 2008.

Chapter Sermon by Fr. Mark.

It is a happy coincidence that the feast of the Annunciation sometimes occurs in Easter Time. It serves to remind us that no feast can be separated from the saving deeds of Jesus that we have just celebrated in Holy Week. Each feast of the year truly contains the whole dying and rising mystery of Christ.

During the eight octave days of Easter the gospels continually present us with encounters of the risen Christ with his disciples. The transposed solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord to Mary can also fruitfully be interpreted within similar parallel meetings between the divine and the human. What an encounter with God Mary had through the intervention of the angel Gabriel: “The power of the Most High will overshadow you”, Gabriel tells her and she becomes pregnant with Jesus! Her womb is opened and the Son of the Most High, the Saviour, is conceived within her body. This life, nurtured in darkness, bursts forth to be the Light of the world. This life, entombed in Mary’s womb, becomes the risen Lord.

But even so, Mary, the first of the disciples and the mother of God, at first receives the angel’s message as one “greatly troubled” and questions the angel, “How can this be?” – These are surely typical human responses. The gospel account shows us how our ways can be completely changed into the ways of God. What transformed Mary from the frightened and questioning young woman we saw at the encounter with Gabriel into the confident though still reticent but firm believer that we have come to see and treasure in the life of the Church and its tradition? This is the same type of question we have seen being asked of the disciples in the face of the death and then of the resurrection of Jesus. What transformed them from doubting followers to believing disciples? And the ultimate question for us in all of these events is, what transforms us?

The first reading in the Mass of the Annunciation relates to a similar dilemma. God offered Ahaz a sign; Ahaz refuses to ask for one and thereby clutches to his own way of thinking. Mary, in spite of being troubled and with questions in her heart, comes to submit to “the power of the Most High.” Her answer (“I am the handmaid of the Lord”), transforms her. Jesus ends his earthly life by doing his Father’s will, and by offering himself as a sacrifice on the cross for our salvation. This act of self-giving allowed the Father to raise him up. Mary in her acceptance of God’s will anticipated Jesus’ own response to the Father. But it was he who, when he had accepted the Father’s plan of salvation for mankind, gave her earlier response its full significance and purpose.

When our Lady replied to Gabriel’s message from on high: “May it be done to me according to your word,” she begot Jesus in the flesh. When Jesus said to his Father in his final hours, “Let your will be done, not mine.” we were raised us up with him to the heights of heaven.

The dimension of the resurrection, therefore, comes into play when we celebrate Gabriel’s greeting to Mary in this Easter Season. His words, “The Lord is with you” become pregnant with the added and fuller meaning that it is the risen Lord who is with us.

By accepting God’s will in our own lives as both Jesus and Mary did in theirs we will truly encounter the risen Christ. And our Easter Alleluias become our way of saying, with Mary, “May it be done to me according to your word.”

Monday, 24 March 2008

Holy Saturday - POSTSCRIPT

Post Script.

Holy Saturday is not Easter Sunday
- the DESCENT INTO HELL.

Hippolytus, (C4), was as clear as the women, NOT going to the tomb before the end of the Sabbath, when he continued the tradition, “Many of the just, proclaiming the Good News and prophesying were awaiting him who was to become by his resurrection the first born from the dead. And so, to save all members of the human race, whether they lived before the law, under the law, or after his own coming, Christ DWELT THREE DAYS BENEATH THE EARTH.

I was not surprised in the pastoral log jam of Saturday/Sunday Masses to find an excellent Homily on Holy Saturday was to be found NOT on the Saturday but on the SUNDAY Easter Vigil.

A Holy Saturday Homily from the Dominican Website, Dublin, although miscued to the Sunday Easter Vigil, seems to express very well some of the Holy Saturday experience.
This is another example of the progressive foreshortening of Holy Saturday and the precipitating of the Easter-Vigil. Monasteries and religious house seem to better attuned to the Blessing of the Easter Fire to coincide with the Sunday Dawn

Our thanks to the Dominican Fathers for this Homily. (Their Website, “Today’s Good News” has been consistently Biblical and theological in its commentary on the Lectern Gospel of the day).

22 March [Easter Vigil Mass] Mt 28:1-10
After the sabbath, as the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.

There is no Eucharist of Holy Saturday. It is the only day of the year when Mass is not celebrated. The altars are stripped bare, tabernacles lie open and empty – an extraordinarily powerful symbol for Catholics. The whole Church is one with Christ in his death. It is necessary to experience this. We have to allow ourselves experience sadness and loss. The Liturgy is a wise teacher.

However, piety immediately negates the power of the empty tabernacle by setting up an altar of repose, much more elaborately decorated with flowers and candles than the high altar ever was. We find it hard to live even for a day with anything that seems like emptiness.

George Steiner, among others, remarked that our world around us today is a kind of prolonged Holy Saturday: the age between Friday and Sunday, between defeat and hope. Today, of all days, the Christian heart feels the darkness of the world, and allows itself to look at the darkness in itself.

The emptiness and darkness that we have allowed ourselves to feel will show us the light of Easter all the more brightly. In the darkness we rise for the Easter Vigil. Against a black sky we light the Easter fire. But this would be a forlorn gesture if Christ were not risen from the dead! Suddenly the Paschal candle is alight. Lumen Christi! – the light of Christ lightens our darkness. Exultet! – “Exult, all creation...! Rejoice, O earth, in shining splendour, radiant in the brightness of your King.... Darkness vanishes forever...! Let this place resound with joy, echoing the mighty song of all God's people!”

U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U

Who links to me?

Who links to me?

Sunday, 23 March 2008

RESURRECTION 2008.

Easter Vigil - Abbot’s Homily

RESURRECTION 2008.

As with all the great events of the life of Christ, His Resurrection has many facets. There is an element of Triumph in it; an element of hope; an element of encouragement; but there is also an element of challenge. The element of Triumph is obvious. Christ has triumphed over death. The element of hope is what makes us look forward to our own bodily resurrection at the end of time. The element of encouragement is what gives us strength to fight our own battles during this life. But the element of challenge is another thing. Perhaps, even the main thing.

Let’s look then at the way the doctrine of the Resurrection challenges our faith. I dont mean that it challenges our faith by being something that is hard to believe in. If we believe in the Divinity of Christ there is no problem in believing that he could rise from the dead. Perhaps some of us might find it difficult to believe in our own bodily resurrection at the end of time. That might be a bit of a challenge to some of us. But that is not the main and most pressing challenge of the Doctrine of the Resurrection. One can ignore the doctrine of our own bodily resurrection if one finds it awkward. But there is a challenge in the doctrine of the resurrection which no one can ignore. Whether we like it or not we have to learn to face it. And if we do take it on board we will find it the answer to, and the support for, all the pains and problems of life.

To understand this challenge we must first consider that the Doctrine of the Resurrection is that Christ has triumphed over death and sin on our behalf. Now we can easily see how Christ has triumphed over death and sin personally but how does that triumph affect us? What does it do for us in our own daily struggle with sin and sickness and disease? What triumph can we claim over sickness and death and sin? We who have to live in the middle of it all, while Christ sits in glory on high! What triumph can we claim over the evils of war and plague and famine when they still stalk the earth so powerfully? Indeed, did Jesus himself not warn us that there will always be wars and rumours of war, and sickness and famine? Where is the triumph of the Resurrection then?

The triumph of the resurrection lies precisely in this: That our triumph will be of exactly the same nature as that of Christ. He attained his resurrection only by passing through death. This is not an understanding of the resurrection that we like to ponder on. But it is the only one which makes the resurrection the answer to all our ills. We will rise with Him, only if we are prepared to pass through death with him. And sufferings of this life are, in fact, that “death” through which we must all pass. We must learn to lift up our minds and hearts to where Christ is, seated in his glory, and realise that it is only when we too have passed through all the sufferings and sadnesses of this life, and eventually death itself will we be delivered from them. The ultimate answer to all our ills is this understanding of the meaning of the triumph of resurrection. But the world, of course, wants all its ills healed here and now, and therefore it is bound to find a terrible frustration and disappointed with life. The soul of faith on the other hand, looks to the resurrection as its real hope, the real deliverance from the evils that so beset us in our life in this world. The resurrection is the ultimate answer and the only complete answer And if one does not believe in the resurrection then there is no answer.

Easter blessings from Fr Raymond, Nunraw

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +


Saturday, 22 March 2008

Holy Saturday 2008

Holy Saturday is not Easter Sunday.

The DESCENT INTO HELL.
The Liturgical and personal celebration of Holy Saturday conveys more clearly the starkness, the vacancy, the void ness of any kind of assurance of consolation in the dying of Jesus. Even the Cross of Good Friday is stripped away, images are veiled, the Tabernacle lies empty, bells are mute, monks’ make none of the usual choir salutations.
Hans Urs von Balthaser, drawing inspiration from the mystical theologian, Adrienne von Speyr, in whose spirituality plays the Descent into Hell plays a massive part, wrote that he aimed not to leave this neglected article of the Old Roman Creed out of account.
In the entrance to the Holy Sepulchre (Church of the Resurrection) in Jerusalem the Pilgrim’s first ‘welcome is at the marble slab, the Stone of Unction, where in the Orthodox tradition elderly people bring the shroud they hope will be used in their dying hours.
On the facing wall is a mural painting depicting of the scenes of (1) the Descent into Hell, (2) the Anointing of Jesus’ Body, (3) the Entombment.
As the most central basilica of Christendom it is known most popularly and most aptly as the HOLY SEPULCHRE. The silence of Holy Saturday, the ominous emptiness of the tomb, pervades the hours of bereft mourning and a sense of expectation of the unknown. It is not anticipation. Anticipation of Easter Sunday is premature. Holy Saturday is not to be ushered a side Chapel.
It is difficult to accept the full reality of Jesus’ death and descent into hell, even for those few hour of prayer. Not many concentrate on the experience of such a one as Adrienne von Speyr in her union with Christ in his Passion and especially in the mystical entering into the Holy Saturday abyss of god-forsakenness.
Not being able to accept too much reality, it is easier to veer quickly into the more visual and audio perception we create in representations of the more comforting glories of the Resurrection.
Hasty anticipation expresses not Jesus’ utter abandonment in death but the instant anticipation of a triumphant awaking of the dead in a victorious release, rescue and recovery. Even St. John takes a leap forward, “after his resurrection, these came out of the tombs”,
(“Mat 27:51 And suddenly, the veil of the Sanctuary was torn in two from top to bottom, the earth quaked, the rocks were split,
Mat 27:52 the tombs opened and the bodies of many holy people rose from the dead,
Mat 27:53 and these, after his resurrection, came out of the tombs, entered the holy city and appeared to a number of people”).
Our understanding of the question is helped by Joseph Ratzinger who wrote a book called Eschatology:
“God himself suffered and died . . . He himself entered into the distinctive freedom of sinners, but he went beyond it in that freedom of his own love which descended willingly into the Abyss. Here the real quality of evil and its consequences become quite palpable, provoking the question . . . whether in this event we are not in touch with a divine response able to draw freedom, precisely as freedom, to itself. The answer lies hidden in Jesus' descent into Sheol, in the night of the soul which he suffered, a night no one can observe except by entering this darkness in suffering faith . . . It is a challenge to suffer in the dark night of faith, to experience communion with Christ in solidarity with his descent into the Night. One draws near to the Lord's radiance by sharing his darkness”.

Stone of Unction upon which the body of Jesus was anointed.
To the rear a mural, (modern iconography), depicts 3 scenes, the Descent into Hell, far right, the Anointing of Jesus’ Body, the Entombment.

BBelow picture of the Adam Chapel situated farther to the right, under which lies Golgotha.
This mural forms a link from the Adam Chapel to Christ’s Tomb further left.
Note the tradition of the Adam Chapel commemorates the burial site of our common father, Adam, and that on the day of the Crucifixion the blood of the Redeemer fell upon that first guilty head. This has given rise to the custom, mainly in the Greek Church, of representing at the foor of the Crucifies a skull and cross-bones.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
He summons Adam and his generation,
brings light where darkness endless seemed;
He frees and claims his own, so long held captive
who, with the living, are redeemed.
Hymn Divine Office

Friday, 21 March 2008

Good Friday


It is Easter Sunday that makes Good Friday good.

“The Church invites us to take on the Paschal Fast; the Easter Fast. Our fast is not of penance but of anticipation. We are like a bride or bridegroom fasting before the wedding celebration.
. . .This is a fast of excitement, of anticipation.
. . . Today we are invited to enter the mystery of Christ’s dying on the cross and rising, the mystery of
our baptism”. (Bible Today).

The actor, Jim Caviezel, played Jesus in the film The Passion of the Christ. He described his experience, “I felt like a great presence came within me at times when we were filimg. This prayer that came from me was, ‘I don’t want people to see me. I just want them to see Jesus. And that conversion will happen’. That’s what I wanted more than anything, that people would have a visceral effect to finally make a decision whether to follow him or not”.



Blessed Guerric of Igny Cistercian abbot 4th sermon for Palm Sunday.

"Happy are all who take refuge in him!" (Ps 2,12)

Blessed may he be who let his hands, his feet and side be pierced that I might make my nest “in the clefts of the rock” (Sg 2,14)
Blessed
may he be who has fully opened himself up to me so that I might go in to the sanctuary of God (cf Ps 42[41],5) and “conceal myself in the shelter of his tent” (Ps 27[26],5). This rock is our refuge… the doves’ sweet place of rest, since the sanctifying holes of those wounds covering his body hold out forgiveness to sinners and grant grace to the just. It is a sure abode, my brethren, “a tower of strength against the enemy” (Ps 61[60],4), when we dwell within the wounds of Christ our Saviour by means of loving and constant meditation, when we seek a sure shelter for our souls in faith and love for the Crucified: a shelter against the rebellion of the flesh, the tempests of the world, the attacks of the devil

The protection of this sanctuary lifts it above all worldly esteem… So enter into this rock, hide yourself…, take refuge in the Crucified… What is the wound in Christ’s side if not the door of the ark, open to all who will be rescued from the flood?
Noah’s ark, however, was only a symbol; here is the reality In this case it is no longer a question of restoring mortal life but of receiving the immortal. Thus it is wholly right that today Christ’s dove, his beautiful one (Sg 2,13-14),… should joyfully sing his praise

From the remembrance or the imitation of the Passion, from meditation on the holy wounds as from the clefts of the rock, his sweetest voice resounds in the Bridegroom’s ears (Sg 2,14).

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Thursday, 20 March 2008

Holy Thursday 2008


Holy Thursday

Jn 13,1-2. - Knowing his time had come . . . . Jesus loved them to the end.

In John’s Gospel there is no account of the institution of the Eucharist at the Last Supper.

In the first half of this gospel the words ‘life’ and ‘live’ occur 50 times, but not once in Jesus' conversation at the Last Supper. Death is hovering near; there is a tremendously significant mention of darkness: “Judas left...and it was night” (13:30).

In the Last Supper discourse: “Jesus disregards himself and his suffering, and shows only love for his own and compassion for their future trials.

Saint Catherine of Siena, (Letter 129) wrote;

“He does not refuse to take up the burden of suffering laid on him by
his Father; to the contrary, he throws himself into it, spurred on by his
great desire. Isn’t this what he reveals during the Last Supper on Holy
Thursday, when he says: “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with
you before I suffer” (Lk 22,15)? By “eat this Passover” he means the
accomplishment of the Father’s will and his desire. Seeing that scarcely
any time lies before him (he was already looking ahead to the end when he
would sacrifice his body for our sake), he rejoices, he is glad and
joyfully says: “I have greatly desired”. Here is the Passover he is

speaking about: that which consists in giving his own self as food, in
laying down his own body in obedience to the Father.

“He does not refuse to take up the burden of suffering laid on him by
his Father; to the contrary, he throws himself into it, spurred on by his
great desire. Isn’t this what he reveals during the Last Supper on Holy
Thursday, when he says: “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with
you before I suffer” (Lk 22,15)? By “eat this Passover” he means the
accomplishment of the Father’s will and his desire. Seeing that scarcely
any time lies before him (he was already looking ahead to the end when he
would sacrifice his body for our sake), he rejoices, he is glad and
joyfully says: “I have greatly desired”. Here is the Passover he is
speaking about: that which consists in giving his own self as food, in
laying down his own body in obedience to the Father”.

“. . . you also ought to wash one another's feet”. Again Jesus is saying, “Do this in memory of me.” He is present. It is a “real presence” in even the humblest service. In this too; it is a kind of Eucharist when our least service is given to each other. Jesus' words are the all time model of humble service [washing their feet] and of prayer (ch. 17), - real presence of grace.


- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Saturday, 15 March 2008

Good Thief on the Cross

Eve of PASSION Sunday
Hi, William,

On this eve of PASSION (Palm) Sunday, thank you for your Poem on Jesus’ 3rd Word from the Cross, “This day you will be with me in Paradise”, Lk. 23:39-43.

You gently assume the place of the ‘Good Thief’ in your prayerful reflection, “Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom”.

It is the Son of Man who plumbs the Dream of Paradise. He Himself is your guide.

Jesus sees the Good Thief, the Jews and each one of those witnessing the Passion from his awareness of their limited understanding, “they do not know”.

In his response to the Good Thief he carries us into the untold depths of his heart – the perception f divine love sparked off by the simple unknowing Dismas.

May your Poem bring blessings to those who pray their way through the Great Week.

Donald.


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

The Dream of Paradise
In the Passion we discover ourselves in Christ Jesus in his unguarded humanity exposed to the power of evil. If we may be one with him in his utter poverty1 we must surrender our self-will and abandon ourselves to divine love, journeying through the darkness of our own estrangement to the centre of our being, that we may discover our divine essence in God’s immanent Word in the light of the Resurrection. Transcending ourselves, we are to become as the Good Thief in his moment of confession that we may awaken in the presence of Uncreated Love, the Dream of Paradise.

1Philippians 2:6-8
Luke 23:43 “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise”
.

I love to dream the Dream of Paradise
As I journey with You along the path to Calvary
By ways unknown leading to the centre of my being,
To the discovery of the divine essence of my soul.

I cannot see beyond the cruel image of the Cross,
The tree that was destined to bear fruit for the living, 1
For all descends into darkness as evil eclipses the sun
At the hour when You contend with Adam’s desolation. 2

As the sun emerges from behind the arc of evil,
Shadows at the core of my being surrendering
I remain, transfixed before the silhouette of the lifeless Cross
No longer bearing the broken figure of my crucified Lord.

Beside the hallowed tree I hear Your Voice upon the evening air 3
Calling to me from far beyond the misery of my nakedness4
To share in the eternal perfection of the Divine Unity of All Being,
To awaken in the presence of Uncreated Love, the Dream of Paradise.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


Genesis 3: 22 [1], 23 [2], 8 [3], 10 [4]
Hosea 6:2 “After two days He will revive us, on the third day
He will raise us up and we shall live in His presence”

William W.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Anam Cara



John O’Donohue (1956-2008)
Rest in Peace




Hi, Christina,
I remember that you had the good fortune, not many years ago, of being in Glendalough, for a seminar on Celtic Spirituality. The resounding voice in this re-discovery and renewal of interest was, of course, John O’Donohue in his classic “Anam Cara”.
We are saddened to learn that John O’Donohue (1956-2008) has died.

You will be interested with the Links to be found with the News of John’s death. The Anam Cara Website and the Blog of Carl McColman. See below.

Today, since he is the Patron Saint of Scotland, we are celebrating the transferred Solemnity of St. Joseph.

Palm Sunday has almost begun for you in Australia. I wish you all the graces of the Great Week and the joy of the Resurrection at Easter,

Donald.

John O’Donohue (1956-2008)

(From Carl McColman) “I am saddened to have learned of the passing of John O’Donohue, author of Anam Cara: A Book of Celtic Wisdom, this past Thursday. He died peacefully in his sleep while on holiday in France. Read the announcement on his website.

In 1999 I had the privilege to interview him for a book industry trade publication; you can read the interview here.

He was not only one of the most articulate voices of living Celtic Christianity and Celtic wisdom, but he also had a clear grasp of the beauty of Christian mysticism as well. He was a trained philosopher with a prodigious intellect. He was the only person I’ve ever met who could effortlessly and lyrically weave together allusions to Martin Heidegger, Meister Eckhart, and the Tuatha Dé Danann in a single sentence.

Rest in peace, John O’Donohue. Walk gladly in the light of Tir na n’Og”.

______________________________

Great Source of Celttic Spirituality.

Usual http Web at: - anamchara.com/2008/01/05/john-odonohue-1954-2008/

Blogger Carl McColman (that's me) is the author of several books including The Aspiring Mystic and 366 Celt.

See Link with Cistercian Abbey of Holy Spirit, Conyers, Atlanta, US.

There are at least six books of John O’Donohue list on Amazon.

Thursday, 13 March 2008

Annual Way of the Cross


Annual Parish Pilgrimage for Lent.

9th March 2008 Parishioners from Roswell, Bonnyrigg and Gorebridge made their Annual Way of the Cross for Lent at Nunraw. They came well clad for the open air procession trek on the south avenue from the Guest-house to the abbey. As they passed the farm animals seemed as much interested in the people as much as the people were interested in them – distraction from devotion or love of the Lord’s creatures? We credit the establishment of the outdoor Stations of the Cross to the members of these parishes. They began this Lenten practice at first by simple choosing their own locations along the route. Later the asked to make the Stations more permanent. They commissioned a local blacksmith, different families sponsored each of iron-wrought Crosses, The crosses are simply numbered, 1st to 14th without any figures attached. (A 15th is added painted in gold, looking to the Resurrection). Now Retreatants can also avail of this prayer in motion going up the avenue and on through the farmyard.

The 12th Station

After some years, one of these visitors noticed a strange sight at the 12th Station. Beside this Station of the Crucifixion she notice, on the bulky trunk of the overhanging beech tree some marking on the bark. From the small cross on the road edge, looking at the bowl of the tree there is the distinctive outline of the cross and figure of the Crucified Saviour. It is as if nature has added its own etching to the contribution of the people who set the Crosses.

The procession then continues on the Abbey for monks regular Office of Vespers. It is followed by Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament. Finally the Abbot gives a Lenten talk for reflection.

This year his theme took up the Raising of Lazarus and a moving reflection on the contrast of the role of Martha and Mary. In a surprising way he also followed a Lent journey by seeing a correspondence of this story with the EIGHTH WORD of the Cross, as he called it.


Talk by Abbot Raymond

He Wants to See You.

The raising of Lazarus from the dead is perhaps the climax of all Jesus’ healing miracles. It comes at the climax of his public life; it is the most dramatically performed of them all – we might even call it the most theatrical, with all the crowds gathered round and the sisters in tears and even Jesus himself weeping and groaning. Then the command to remove the stone; then the loud cry: “Lazarus, come forth” and so on. But for me there has always been one little detail in that story, a detail I have never understood, yet it always strikes me as very strange and very significant. Why did Mary stay at home when Martha ran to meet Jesus? Why did Jesus have to send Martha back to tell her that he wanted to see her?

When he did arrive, eventually, four days after Lazarus had been laid in the tomb, it was Martha, as we have been considering, who ran to meet him. Mary stayed on at home. Why? We might have thought that Mary, being the personification of the contemplative soul, the one whose love prompted her to anoint the Lord’s feet with precious ointment and wipe his feet with her hair; surely she would be the most eager to run to meet him. But no, it was Martha who ran first. Not that Martha’s first words to Jesus were any different from those of Mary when she did come: “If you had been here, my brother wouldn’t have died.” So we are left with the puzzle: Why did Mary stay at home?

We might understand Mary’s behaviour if we consider her as being the more contemplative and introvert of the two sisters. Perhaps therefore, although she might feel the grief more keenly, yet she was more able to support it and bear it with her own inner strength. Martha, on the other hand was more extrovert; she wore hear heart on her sleeve. If she was angry she just had to show it: “Tell my sister to help me instead of just sitting there!” If she was heartbroken and uncomprehending she just had to run and tell the Lord. “If only you had been here my brother would not have died!”

Surely there is a deep meaning in all this. Surely God has something important to teach us in this. In the first Martha-Mary story it is Mary who comes out tops. She is the one who chose the better part, but in this story it is Martha who shines, she knows what to do. The lesson Jesus wants to convey is seen best in Martha and, as in the first story, it is precisely the contrast between the behaviour of the two which brings out the lesson.

From this point of view the climax of the story, the punch line of the lesson, is contained in the words of Jesus to Martha when he tells her to call Mary because he wants to see her. “Jesus is here and He wants to see you!” Martha told her. From these words Mary learns that no matter how heroic and accepting she is of Lazarus death, Jesus wants her to understand that it is better for her to give full human expression to her grief. She is not an angel, but a human being of flesh and blood. There are times when we must wear our hearts on our sleeves and give full expression to our grief before the Lord. He doesn’t mind if we let him know how hurt we are. It brings us closer to him. He doesn’t mind if we complain and ask him why this has to be.

This lovely little story is Jesus’ way of saying to Mary and to us all: “There are times when you mustn’t hide your feelings from me; no more than you would hide them from your dearest friend on earth. In the first Martha-Mary story it was Mary who chose the better part, but in this story it is obviously Martha who chose the better part. In the first story it was Mary who best understood the heart of the Master; in the second story it was Martha who best understood the heart of the Master.

Let us wear our hearts on our sleeves. This wearing of our heart in our sleeve also comes into our Lent as we come near Holy week. It can be seen in another story. It is one of the last words of Jesus corresponding to telling Mary ‘COME’. We know of the SEVEN Words on the Cross but there was another saying, just before he went to the Cross. He turned to the women of Jerusalem and he said, “Weep not for me, weep for yourselves and your children”. Did he mean that? Don’t week for me. There is a tremendous lesson in that.

Compassion in the Passion.
Eighth Last Words

We often speak of the Seven Last words of Jesus; the last words he spoke while hanging on the Cross:

1. “Woman, behold your Son” “Behold your Mother”
2 Father, forgive them. They know not what they do”
3 “This day you will be with me in Paradise
4 “My God! My God! Why have you forsaken me?”
5 “I thirst!”
6 “It is accomplished”
7 “Father, into your hands I commend my Spirit.”

However we might add an eighth last saying; one pronounced, not while hanging from the cross, but while on his way to the Cross. The words he spoke to the women of Jerusalem: “Weep not for me, but for yourselves and for your children.”

These words say so much about the mystery of the cross and, in their own way are a complete description of the mind and heart of Christ in his passion.

As we look on him hanging on the Cross we should see, not just the sufferings of Christ alone, but, in him, the sufferings of the whole human race from Adam to Eternity. The nails are not just in the hands and feet of the Saviour, but in the hands and feet of all suffering humanity.

Don’t weep for me but for yourselves and for your children, he said. There must be some tremendous lesson in that. I think it is this that is the lesson, and it is very closely related to the story we have of Mary and Martha.
He is saying, “I am going to hang on the cross for you and yet the nails in my hands and feet are not really in MY hands and feet. The nails are in your hands and feet, in the hands and feet of your children. It is not my cross. It is your cross, down all the centuries. So he sees the suffering of all his children. And he had to take in that. So his Passion and the suffering was not so much FOR us as WITH us. And he wants us to weep for each other, not so much for Christ as for all those who suffering. It is their cross. Jesus could have loosened himself from the cross and come down.. But you and I can’t. --- and that of the children and the sons of men. We cannot escape it. We might struggle against it, may fight against it but the nails will only tear us the more.

Jesus knows this. Because he wants our compassion to reach out through all our brothers and sisters. And in the past, and in the future and in the resent.

“Weep not for me but for yourselves and your children”, and let me see that weeping, that it be a weeping of compassion, as my Passion was the suffering of compassion.

Our Faith is a Faith of joy indeed, but as long as this world is so full of sadness and suffering, then a sense of compassion can never be far from our minds. And this is not a compassion that dampens our joy, but one which keeps it peacefully in due proportion.

When Jesus said: “Weep not for me, but for yourselves and for your children”, he really meant it. Let us learn to respect the sincerity of his words and take them really at their face value.

_____________________