Thursday 20 January 2011

Reviews of Atlas Monks Film Award and ARCHIVE "A Heritage Too Big For Us"



Reviews of Atlas Monks Film award -
Of Gods and Men, Des Hommes Et Des Dieux
Glasgow
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Andy . . .
To: Donald . . .Sent: Mon, 6 December, 2010 0:34:37
Subject:  Of Gods and Men Des Hommes et des Dieux
Dear Donald
Anne Marie and I have just returned from seeing the film of Gods and Men.  What a movie. Very sensitive to the spirituality of the life within the monastery. The setting depicted the very simplistic way of life of these monks and actors in no way detracted from the sensitive nature of the build up to the kidnapping of the seven martyrs. 

The movie was very spiritual, prayerful and at parts very emotional especially after the community had decided to remain in the monastery and during the community meal one of the monks opened bottles of wine and played a recording from Swan Lake - a very moving part of the story as each member of the community realised what lay ahead of them

The sensitivity of the Cistercian way of life was very evident in the singing of the psalms, in the celebration of the Eucharist and in the Salve Regina. On looking a some of the photographs of the Atlas Martyrs it is amazing how the actors chosen to portray the monks resembled them. A film well worth seeing.

God bless
Andy

Amazon US 
5.0 out of 5 stars 
Brothers of Tibhirine,
11 Dec 2010
By  Benedict – 
Movie Review
Of Gods and Men OST (Des Hommes et des Dieux) (Audio CD)
After seeing this film I was moved by the very carefully selected music used as assist in the understanding of the spiritual, emotional and prayerful depth of the real life story of the Atlas Martyrs. The use of Latin and French text in the singing aids the listener, or viewer of the film, to become involved in the prayerful atmosphere portrayed within the Cistercian monastery. The musical climax of the movie is the background playing of Swan Lake as the community share their "Last Supper". A movie worth seeing and a soundtrack worth listening too.
 

Glasgow
---- Forwarded Message ----
From: Anne Marie . . .
To: nunraw Donald . . . .
Sent: Mon, 6 December, 2010 21:42:56
Subject: Movie review

Well, the film is more than you would expect. When it comes to monasticism I wondered if they would be able capture it.
They did it by not being afraid to be silent and to allow the
chant to do its work.  It seemed to bring you to the heart of the matter, something mysterious and wonderful. 
The relationship between the community and the village was a true bond despite religious differences and obviously a very important focus.
I won't spoil any more for you.  I was deeply moved by the film due to its simplicity.
Anne Marie
Dublin
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Noreen . . .
To: Donald. . .
Sent: Tue, 28 December, 2010 20:58:32
Subject: Re: Movie review
Jo and I managed to see the film "Of Gods and men" on the 13th Dec. at the Irish Film Institute in Dublin.  They show award winning films from other countries.  It was shown in a smallish cinema, which was full that afternoon.  A lady next to me said there were so many coming that they were going to transfer it to a larger cinema within their complex.  It was shown for a full month.  Unfortunately, it is not showing in the larger cinemas in the city.
Jo and I really enjoyed it very much and found it easy to follow the French with English dubbing.  It is rare to see such a beautiful presentation of Religious life.  Having so much background knowledge from you both was of course helpful.  It is great to read such positive reviews also.
. . .
Noreen.

Edinbugh
The film Of Gods and Men Des Hommes et des Dieux  was in Edinburgh.
Friends, who saw it, were gripped by the whole presentation.
Another friend hurried to view the last showing and regretfully could not get place even among the standing.

Leeds
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: John . . .
To: Donald . . .
Sent: Tue, 18 January, 2011
Subject: RE: Leeds cinema.
Dear Fr Donald,

Thank you so much for your kind email and the attachment. I was delighted to be able to print the copy of volume 1 of “A Heritage Too Big for Us” from the online version you sent. I’ve long had and interest in the Atlas Martyrs ever since reading John Kiser’s account. Their martyrdom has come to new appreciation through the film ‘Of Gods and Men’ which I saw twice in Leeds. I found it immensely moving.
Yours . . 
John


Peter from Leicester spoke to us about how riveting and impressive silence at the end of the showing. 
Other Emails and Letters came from UK and came friends in France to tell us of their pleasure to see the film on the Atlas Monks.


Our anticipation awaits the availability of the DVD. 
The Amazon provider disappointed us by supplying the CD Audio ONLY,
and then failed completely to offer the DVD Of Gods and Men, Des Hommes Et Des Dieux.
Perhaps it may find the DVD through www.amazon.fr/dvd-dvds-doccasion-imports...tv/b?


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

RESOURCE.
An Archive of the background of the seven monks of Atlas, Algeria.
For those who wish to read more on our book on-line here.


A Heritage Too Big For US

Atlas Martyrs
Vol 1. edited by
Donald McGlynn, ocso


On May 21, 1996, seven monks of the Cistercian-Trappist monastery of Our Lady of Atlas in Algeria died by assassination at the hands of terrorists: Fr. Christian de Chergé, Br. Luc Dochier, Fr. Christophe Lebreton, Br. Paul Favre-Miville, Br. Michel Fleury, Fr. Bruno Lemarchand, and Fr. Célestin Ringeard.
In my heart a single phrase was resounding: “We will not leave our dead alone, we shall come back!” (Dom Bernardo Olivera, OCSO)[1]
 From the beginning the General Chapter has been marked by the luminous witness of our brothers of Atlas who have reminded us of the meaning, the value, and the fecundity of a cenobitic life in the radical following of Christ, rooted in the local Church, responsible for a particular people, open to dialogue between religions and cultures. (Message of the General Chapter of 1996)[2]
Tibhirine was for us an icon of our vocation as Christians seeking God in the land of Algeria, that is to say in a Muslim land. . . . I think there is no other monastery in the world which has such a general relationship with the members of the local Church. Most of the priests, religious men and women, as well as the laity living permanently in the diocese, had a personal bond with the community. (Mgr. Henri Teissier, Archbishop of Algiers)[3]
I had hardly arrived in their house, so poor and welcoming at the same time, when deep within me, coming I know not from where, I had the powerful feeling that the true monks of today were right there. And I remembered the words of Jean Baptiste Metz: that the religious life can no longer be understood away from that precariousness which tells of its openness to the eschatological. (Fr. Philippe Hémon, Tamié)[4]

Chronology

March 27–May 21 Fifty-six days of abduction.

March 27
Abduction of seven monks in their monastery of Our Lady of Atlas, Tibhirine.
March 28
Paris demands that Algeria put all its forces into operation to free them.
April 14
Pope John Paul II, in Tunisia, declares that his thoughts “turned first of all” to the seven Trappists.
April 25
The aman, the protection of the previous emir, is revoked. The GIA justify their kidnapping of the monks “still alive” and demand of President Chirac “an exchange of your prisoners for our prisoners.”
April 28
More than 2000 people pray in Notre Dame in Paris with the leaders of different religions.
April 30
The French ambassador receives an audio cassette confirming that the monks are still alive, as well as a letter laying down the conditions for negotiation.
May 1
A day of prayer is observed world-wide in Cistercian monasteries.
May 7
In Paris, Muslim leaders issue a letter to the kidnappers condemning their action as a violation of Islamic precepts.
May 9
The French authorities affirm that they will not negotiate with the GIA.
May 21
The GIA affirm: “We have cut the throats of the seven monks.”
May 27
Pentecost. Testament of Fr. Christian is opened. “Words to inspire the world” give keynote to reflections on the events.
May 30
Cardinal Léon-Étienne Duval dies at ninety-two. The remains of the seven monks are found. Abbot General Bernardo Olivera arrives in Algiers.
June 2
Cardinal Arinze preaches panegyric at Mass in Algiers for the seven monks and Cardinal Duval.
June 4
Transfer of remains by seven military ambulances to Tibhirine. Burial of the seven monks surrounded by mourning Muslim neighbors.
July 16
Reported assassination of Djamel Zitouni by other rebels.
August 1
Bishop Pierre Claverie of Oran is killed by a bomb on his own doorstep.
October 5
 Fr. Jean-Pierre addresses the General Chapter on “Present Situation of Atlas.”
October 12
At Tre Fontane, Rome, Archbishop Teissier preaches at Mass of General Chapter. Pope sends message from hospital.
    

Abduction: March 26–27, 1996

Among those who lived through the events of the forced entry of the GIA terrorists (Armed Islamic Group) and the abduction of seven monks on the night of March 26–27, 1996, were three eyewitnesses who wrote accounts of what happened.[5] Fr. Jean-Pierre was the porter of the monastery, who observed some of the activities of that night. Fr. Amadeus’s room was close to the medical supplies, which diverted attention from his locked door. The third witness was one of twelve members of the Ribât group staying in the guest quarters. They were fortunate to remain undetected. Each became aware of what was happening in his own way. It is remarkable that so much could have been going on, within the same walls, without everyone’s being alerted. A clear, composite picture of events emerges from the independent accounts of these witnesses.
At the midday hour of March 26, 1996, the community Mass was celebrated as usual. As the brothers heard the Gospel of the day, they could not have anticipated the manner in which the words from John 8:21–30, “I am going away and you will seek me,” were to be realized tragically in seven of them that very night.
At 5:30 p.m., the end of the working day, the time people stopped coming to the dispensary, Fr. Jean-Pierre locked up for the night. The Security Services had been insisting on early closing for some time. At 1:15 a.m., Fr. Jean-Pierre, sleeping in the porter’s room next to the entrance, was awakened by the sound of voices. Remaining concealed, he made out two or three persons speaking in Arabic and immediately realized it could only be the “brothers from the mountain” who had somehow gained access to the cloister. A man with a tommy-gun joined the others. From another angle Jean-Pierre saw a turbaned figure, also with a tommy-gun slung across his shoulder, making an entrance near Br. Luc’s room; conversation was low and there was no violence, so he did not realize the gravity of the situation. He had not heard the doorbell and therefore assumed that Fr. Christian had forestalled him and had taken matters in hand just as he had done on that all too acutely remembered forced entry of Christmas Eve, 1993. He had no idea that some twenty terrorists were deployed. He felt it wiser not to show himself and prayed anxiously for them to go away. The thought of death and martyrdom had often occurred to him but not the possibility of being taken hostage. He heard someone ask “Who is the chief?” and a reply, “That’s him, the chief. You must do what he tells you,” followed by comings and goings in the entrance hall. Then silence, and the sound of the street door being closed. He thought Christian had sent the intruders away. He went to go to the bathroom before returning to bed. The lights had been turned off; everything seemed in order, except for some clothing scattered about. He wondered, “Did they ask for some clothing that they did not like and threw there on their way out?” Everything else seemed normal. There was nothing more to be done. Jean-Pierre did not know that the lights had been turned off by Fr. Amadeus.
Fr. Amadeus had been awakened by noise that made him think of Br. Luc looking for medicines, except that Luc would not be so rough. He could then hear voices but not Luc’s familiar asthmatic cough. Someone tried his door. It was locked and the intruders seemed to turn their attention back to the medicine cartons. Amadeus used his torch to check his watch. It was 1:15 a.m. He dressed silently. The figures were too close to the door for him to see much through the keyhole as they continued to ransack the medicine stores. After activities had stopped, he eased his door open. The lights were on. Everything was in disarray. In the adjoining room of Br. Luc, medicines and books were on the floor. The new little radio had gone. Expecting the worst, he rushed to Fr. Christian’s office, where Christian had been sleeping recently in order to be near those at the entrance. There also everything was turned upside down, the electric typewriter and camera had disappeared, and the telephone had been removed. Of Fr. Christian and Br. Luc there was no sign.
“What about the guests?” It was at this point that he quickly extinguished the lights and hurried to find out about the twelve members of the Ribât who were in the guest rooms near the community bedrooms. The doors of the monks’ rooms all lay open, lights on, everything scattered about and the brothers gone. In great fear for the guests he continued along the passage through the enclosure door to the guest quarters. There everything was quiet. The night-lights were on and the bedroom doors closed. He knocked on the first door. He found the occupant wide awake and waiting, having been roused earlier by another guest in the group. The two listened in alarm. They thought they heard Célestin’s voice among others and supposed he might have taken ill and that the brothers wanted to move him downstairs, or might have wanted to take him to the hospital, but that was impossible in the night. Boldly, one of the two half-opened the monks’ enclosure door. They knew immediately that the terrorists had come again. When at last there was silence and the hallway was empty, they still could not risk making themselves conspicuous or try to escape by the external stairs, fearing that armed men were still around. They decided to return to their rooms.
The intruders made a quick departure. Did they think they had their full catch of hostages after they had rounded up seven of the monks? They would not have known that two monks, Br. Paul and Fr. Bruno, had arrived just that previous evening, another indication of a premeditated kidnapping. Police findings showed that taxis had been requisitioned at the village of Ain Elrais. These were later found abandoned. After that the kidnappers seem to have used mules to cover their trek into hiding in the mountains.
 As the guest in the room nearest the monks’ enclosure waited in his bed with thoughts of death, listening for further sounds, Fr. Amadeus appeared with a torch saying, “Are you there? The monastery is empty. There isn’t a single father left!” Together they began their search. The guest noticed that Br. Paul’s room was littered with the wrappings of gifts and sweets he had just brought back for Easter. He noticed one box left untouched because, he guessed, the chocolates contained alcohol. He later placed these in the refrigerator to await the return of the brothers. A large cheese was likewise left lying near the statue of Our Lady, because it had the large Savoy Cross on the Tamié wrapping. In the kitchen, refectory, and cloister they found little disturbed, except that the telephone line had been cut. They went toward the porter’s room. “Jean-Pierre, it’s Amadeus, are you there?” To their great relief Jean-Pierre, fully dressed, opened the door with his usual peaceful smile. They told him, “We are the only ones here, all the others have been taken away.”
The first thing to do was to contact the Security Services, but the telephone lines had been cut. It was later found that the wires had been severed fifteen kilometers away, another mark of a well-planned raid. They went to the nearest house with a phone, only to discover that they could not make a call. The family was terribly frightened, and Fr. Jean-Pierre stayed awhile to comfort and encourage them.
By 3:00 a.m. nothing more could be done, and it was decided to rest until the office of Vigils. Amadeus said he had not finished the rosary he had begun while the others were out. Together they completed the prayer. “Amadeus radiated an extraordinary peace,” the guest noticed. As arranged, they began Vigils at 5:15, three guests feeling honored to hold the place in choir of the abducted brothers, as best they could. It was thus in the chapel that the other Ribât members, nine sisters, found them.
At dawn there was an unusual silence. The call of the muezzin did not mingle with the sound of the monastery bell. It seemed that the villagers already knew of the attack and were fearful. The twenty or so faithful who normally came to the mosque, part of the monastery building, for dawn prayer did not come. Fr. Jean-Pierre and one of the guests drove off through the mist and arrived at the police station at Médéa at 7:15 a.m. The commandant was on the point of setting off on a planned operation but gave them his full attention. He immediately contacted his superiors and obtained authorization to inform Archbishop Teissier, the French Ambassador, and the Algerian Press Service. All was conducted in Arabic and with surprising alacrity.
Ten members of the Ribât group departed for Algiers in two cars. One had to wait for other transport. Another decided to stay with Jean-Pierre and Amadeus that night. The group reassembled at the Diocesan Center, “in communion with our wounded Church and at the same time conscious that, as Sr. Jean-Marie said, our brothers were living or were already in the light of God, and it was for us to watch with them. This is why we felt it right to continue our programme.”[6]
During the day a contingent of police and then a detachment of soldiers came to investigate. When they began to enter the cloister they were stopped by the guest who asked them to stay at the entrance, using the words of Fr. Christian on an earlier occasion: “This is a place of prayer and of peace. We do not enter it with arms.” In each case the armed men respected this situation. In the evening Jean-Pierre and Amadeus accepted the military instructions and were guests at a hotel in Médéa for that night. The Ribât guest accompanied them and admired how Jean-Pierre and Amadeus, in their rough jackets and woolen bonnets, spoke with their usual simplicity and peacefulness to the hotel manager, the head of the prefecture, the chief of police, and everyone who welcomed them and wanted to fuss over them.[7]

History of Cistercian Monks (Trappists) in Algeria 1843–1904, 1934–97[8]

The fate of the Cistercian monks of Our Lady of Atlas at Tibhirine, like the many Trappists who completed their special religious calling in Algeria before them, is marked by its Cistercian character. The present Constitutions of the Order, approved as recently as 1990, express the exceptional nature of certain communities living in non-Christian environments: “In God’s providence monasteries are holy places not only for those who are of the household of the faith, but for all persons of good will” (ST 30.B). North Africa has always been exceptional, because it has held little hope of local recruitment, and more especially because it has provided the need for a Christian presence of a purely spiritual character in a non-Christian milieu.
The lives of the young monks who died in the early years of Staouëli[9] are remembered not for anything they had to do with the forces of political power of French colonization, which differed so much from those of the conflict of Algerian Independence, but for the uncompromising pursuit of their own monastic vocation of silence, prayer, and labor.
The commendable achievements attributed to the monks for a number of good reasons—their contributions in agriculture, education, evangelism, and medicine—may be a credit to them but are extrinsic to their real aim. These achievements demonstrate both the reality of the social, religious, and political conditions and how little these impinge upon the life of the anonymous monk following the simple Cistercian vocation of austerity and prayer. The lot of the Atlas monks in 1996 was apparently at the mercy of external circumstances, as was that of their predecessors at Staouëli in the previous century, and at the same time distinctive in the primacy of its spiritual goal and faithfulness to that goal alone.    

Tuesday 18 January 2011

One in the apostles’ teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread and prayer



This year's Week of Prayer for Christian Unity
centers on Jerusalem and essentials of the faith
 
 The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, to be celebrated January 18-25 in most Christian churches in the northern hemisphere, will be grounded in the experience of the churches in Jerusalem.
Week of Prayer for Christian Unity
The theme - "One in the apostles’ teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread and prayer" (Acts 2:42) - was chosen by a group of Christian leaders in Jerusalem. The leaders intend the theme as a call for inspiration and renewal, a return to the essentials of the faith, and a call to remember the time when the church was still one. 

World Council of Churches general secretary Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit wrote in a letter to churches introducing the prayers for 2011, "The unity of the church we seek is not a mere abstraction. For Christians in Jerusalem, who live in continuity with the apostolic community of Jerusalem, the mother church of us all, such unity entails prayer, reflection and a cry arising within a context of despair and suffering. Together with them we trust that God is ever vigilant as we pray for peace and justice for all inhabitants of the Holy Land."



                                                Biblos Com  http://biblos.com/acts/2-42.htm

Dom Bertrand Oko Cistercian

Our Lady of the Angels Cistercian Priory,
Nsugbe; Oyi L.G.A.
P.O. Box 6976
Onitsha, Anambra State
NIGERIA 
  + O.C.S.O. Order of Cistercians of the Strict Observance

  • January 15, 2011: 
  • Dom Bertrand Oko
  • Born in 1947 in Akpugo, Enugu (Nigeria), 
  • He entered Awhum in 1977 and made his solemn profession in 1992. 
  • He was ordained a priest in 1995. 
  • He had been Prior of Awhum from 2000 to 2006 and 
  • was Prior of Nsugbe since October 24, 2010. 
  • Father was 63 years old, 
  • had been in monastic vows for 30 years and 
  • was a priest for 15 years 
  • when the Lord called him.

Sunday 16 January 2011

Sudden Death of Prior Bertrand, Cistercian, Nigeria

SECOND SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME  Homily, Fr. Raymond
St.John Baptist -Behold Lamb God
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Raymond . . .
Sent: Sun, 16 January, 2011 10:12:34
Subject: Gospel 2nd Sunday of Year A

THE BAPTIST AND THE LAMB OF GOD– 2010
Seeing Jesus coming towards him, John said, “Look, there is the lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world”   In this Gospel scene John seems to contradict himself.  
He tells us who Jesus is and yet tells us that he did not know who he was.        
  

     
Perhaps the explanation lies in this being a moment of final revelation; a moment of climax when he fully understood at last the fullness of who and what Jesus was.    
Until this moment he had only known him as one whose sandals he was not fit to undo; one to whose greatness the Spirit and a heavenly voice had borne witness when he came to John for baptism.  But now he is revealed to John fully and clearly as the lamb of sacrifice, a sacrifice that would take away the sin of the world.
“Look, there is the lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world”  We have all grown very familiar with these words over the years.  
They are the words pronounced by the priest as he holds up the host before distributing Holy Communion.  The Holy Spirit has guided the Church to use these precise words at this very important moment in the lives of her children, the moment immediately before they receive their Lord in Holy Communion.    
Since Jesus assured his Apostles – and their successors – that “He who hears you, hears me” we can therefore be very sure that whatever sentiments are hidden in those words, whatever it is they are trying to say to us at that most sacred moment; then that is precisely what is in Jesus mind and heart as he offers himself to us in holy communion.
By these words Jesus wishes to bring home to us the fact that He isn’t offering himself simply as offering an intimate communion with himself. When his priests hold up the host and say: “This is the lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world”  Jesus is saying something more than that. He is wishing to convey to us that he offers himself to us precisely as having sacrificed himself for us; as having given his very life for us.  
Indeed the very consecration of the two separate elements of bread and wine are symbolic of the separation of his body and blood for us in his death.
+ + +

Sudden Death of Prior Bertrand
This morning, in the Mass we remembered 
Fr. Bertrand  of the community of
Our Lady of the Angels
Cistercian Priory,
Nsugbe, Nigeria

About 7:30 this morning we received word that
Dom Bertrand of Nsugbe died.
He had pneumonia and was at the hospital.
Apparently he had some x-rays and on his way back to his room died in the Brothers arms.
The Community is in shock.
Dom Bertrand, formerly from Awhum Abbey, was elected Prior to Nsugbe Priory, only in the Autumn 2010.
We pray for the soul of Betrand and remember the Community of Nsugbe.
 +

Saturday 15 January 2011

Saints Maurus and Placid, the first Benedictine Oblates


Disciples
Jesus calls Levi

Saturday of the First week in Ordinary Time
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Mark 2:13-17.

15 January 2011
Saints Maurus and Placid, the first Benedict Oblates. Memorial  

History and Hagiography are fertile imagination.
The deep roots are in St. Benedict and St. Gregory the Great.
More specific is the 59th Chapter of the Rule of Saint Benedict.
Quote …
The Bible and Liturgy roots of the first Benedictine Oblates of the young boys of Maurus and Placid were offered as the oblata on the altar.

The Biblical and Eucharistic context is in the Gospel about Levi, named in Mark and Luke, called Matthew in his Gospel.
Mk. 2:14. ‘Jesus went out along the sea. All the crowd came to him and he taught them. As he passed by, he saw Levi, son of Alphaeus, sitting at the customs post. Jesus said to him,
"Follow me."

And he got up and followed him.  . . .

The disciples Maur and Placid heard that call and followed.
At this Mass, may our response, our oblata on the altar, “get up and follow the Lord”.
+ + +
The Call of Levi (Matthew)
Mat 9:9-13
Mar 2:13-17
Luk 5:27-32

RULE OF ST. BENEDICT
CHAPTER LIX
Of the Sons of Nobles or of Poor Men that are offered
IF any nobleman shall perchance offer his son to God in the Monastery, let the parents, should the boy be still in infancy, make for him the written promise as aforesaid; and together with the oblation let them wrap that promise and the hand of the child in the altar-cloth and so offer him up.

Jerusalem Bible 'prove'? Mark 2:10


Mass Fri  14 January

Gospel Mark 2:1-12.

The thoughts of the presiding priest spotlighted the Jerusalem Bible translation of Mark 2:10. “To PROVE to you …”. In the context, it is wrong. PROOF is in different world from  AUTHORITY.

The Jerusalem Bible seemed to be on its own in the use of “PROVE”.

Now I find The New Living Translation also uses “PROVE”

 

Most of the translations are.

“That you may know” versions have been in the main.

 

Ronald Knox turns his own furrow, translating, “Now to CONVINCE you”.

 

The Amplified Bible is the most challenging variant by the clause, “That you know positively and beyond a doubt”.

 

Further SEARCH see below Sacra Pagina

 

Considering that the Greek and Latin word is consistently unvarying.

 

There follows ths selection of versions.

 

 

Mark 2:10 (New Jerusalem Bible)
But to prove to you that the Son of man has authority to forgive sins on earth' --


Mark 2 10 (Ronald Knox)
And now, to convince you that the Son of Man has authority to forgive sins while he is on earth (here he spoke to the palsied man);
“CONVINCE”, translated by Knox and explained in the Knox-Cox ‘Gospel Story’,
Jesus knew at once, in his spirit, of these secret thoughts of theirs (Pharisees), and said to them openly, 'Why do you reason thus in your minds? Which command is more lightly given, to say to the paralysed man, "Your sins are forgiven," or to say, "Rise up, take your bed with you, and walk"? And now to convince you that the Son of Man has authority to forgive sins while he is on earth' (here he spoke to the paralysed man), 'Rise up, take your bed with you, and go home.' (p.72)

This is the most explicit public claim to divine power that our Lord makes during his Galilean ministry. He is not claiming delegated power from God (a human being could have such power, as a priest in the sacrament of Penance); he claims au­thority in his own right as the Messias ('Son of Man'), during his earthly life. This can only mean that he is God incarnate. He speaks openly like this mainly for the learned Pharisees; be would have them understand his claim to divinity from the start. (p.73)


Mark 2:10 (Amplified Bible)
10But that you may know positively and beyond a doubt that the Son of Man has right and authority and power on earth to forgive sins--He said to the paralyzed man,

 

Mark 2:10 (New Living Translation)

10 So I will prove to you that the Son of Man[a] has the authority on earth to forgive sins.” Then Jesus turned to the paralyzed man and said,
(Good News Bible) I will prove to you, then, that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins." So he said to the paralyzed man,

 

Mark 2:10 (King James Version)

 10But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)

Mark 2:10 (New King James Version)

10 But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins”—He said to the paralytic,

 

ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΡΚΟΝ 2:10 (1881 Westcott-Hort New Testament)

 10ινα δε ειδητε οτι εξουσιαν εχει ο υιος του ανθρωπου αφιεναι αμαρτιας επι της γης λεγει τω παραλυτικω

 

(Vulgate)  ut autem sciatis quia potestatem habet Filius hominis in terra dimittendi peccata ait paralytico

(DRB)  But that you may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins (he saith to the sick of the palsy):

 

Mark 2:10 (New International Version - UK)

10 But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins . . . . He said to the paralytic,

(RSV)  But that you may know that the Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins"--he said to the paralytic--

(UPDV) But that you+ may know that the Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins--he says to the sick of the palsy:

SACRA PAGINA 2002
Mark 2:10. But you might realize that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sin,” he said to the paralyzed man;

But that you might realize that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sin: This verse constitutes an anacoluthon, that is, a departure from the expected structure of the sentence or flow of thought. Verse 11 could follow immedi­ately upon v. 9. Many authors interpret the Son of Man saying here not as a continuation of Jesus' words but as an authorial aside to the reader (see 13:14). Still, though awkward, the text can be read as a saying of Jesus that interprets the following action. The key elements of the saying are the title "Son of Man" and the phrase "has power (or authority) on earth" (exousian echei ... epi ges).

 

 

William,
You have been so kind to pursue this search also.
Thank you for further clarity.
D. . .

Knox-Cox commentary - two magnificent passages:
"A dramatic interlude gave Jesus the opportunity of showing the true nature of his mission (forgiveness of sins), and sufficient evidence for thinking men of his divine nature".. and .. "This is the most explicit public claim to divine power that our Lord makes during his Galilean ministry. He is not claiming delegated power from God.. he claims authority in his own right as the Messias ('Son of Man'), during his earthly life. This can only mean that he is God incarnate. He speaks openly like this mainly for the learned Pharisees; he would have them understand his claim to divinity from the start." 

Jerome commentary - has three good sentences:
"the healing functions as the sign for the validity of Jesus' declaration about forgiveness"
"Jesus heals by word alone - a fact that confirms the authority of his words about forgiveness"
"the object of the crowd's amazement included both Jesus' healing power and his claim to forgive sins"

Nelson commentary - adds two reflections:
"[The title] 'Son of Man' - Jesus uses it at this early stage of his ministry to provoke reflection, and as a hint of his more than human person. [The words] 'authority' and 'on earth' are direct allusions to Daniel 7:14; Jesus here exercises his authority as universal judge.

Sacra Pagina - has a very interesting translation [based on the Greek text in Novum Testamentum Graece (27th ed. 1993) / Greek New Testament (4th ed. 1994) ] and subtle comment:-
But that you might realize that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sin
"This verse constitutes an anacolouthon {new word to me! Chambers dictionary: want of syntactical sequence, when the  latter part of a sentence does not grammatically fit the earlier}, that is, a departure from the expected structure of the sentence or flow of thought. Verse 11 could follow immediately upon v. 9. Many authors interpret the Son of Man saying here not as a continuation of Jesus' words but as an authorial aside to the reader. Still, though awkward, the text can be read as a saying of Jesus that interprets the following action. The key elements of the saying are the title 'Son of Man' and the phrase 'has power (or authority) on earth'."

In the Interpretation section there are some further reflections on the richness of "this short narrative for contemporary actualization of fundamental Christian themes".


Saint Kentigern Solemnity in Glasgow

Thursday of the First Week in Ordinary Time
Saint Kentigern  Feast at Nunraw. Pending Homily of Archbishop Conti of Glasgow
St. Mungo(Kentigern), Townhead, Glasgow
Previous Post

13 Jan 2010

St Kentigern (or St Mungo) was born at the beginning of the sixth century. He is said to be a native of East Lothian. Kentigern was brought up by St. Serf in a monastic school at Culross on the Firth of Forth. He became a missionary to ...