Sunday 19 August 2012

The Vision of Saint Bernard marks Fra Bartolomeo's return to art in 1504.



Solemnity of St. Bernard of Clairvaux August 20
Bernard of Clairvaux (+ 1153) is considered the last of the Fathers of the Church and is a Doctor of the Chrurch.



  
The Vision of Saint Bernard (1504),
Fra Bartolomeo (1472-1517),
Uffizi Museum, Florence, Italy.

BEFORE FRA BARTOLOMEO (nicknamed Bacciol joined the Dominican Order, he had been an ardent disciple of the firebrand preacher Savonarola. He was spellbound by the apocalyptic warnings proclaimed from the pulpit at San Marco by the controversial friar who condemned the citizens of Florence for their decadent ways, and artists in particular for adopting pagan themes while their religious works lacked humility and reverence. Baccio participated in the "Bonfire of the Vanities" whereupon artists who had a change of heart submitted their secular and irreverent works to the flame. He even barricaded himself inside the Dominican priory of San Marco with five hundred other supporters when it was stormed by a mob opposed to the theocrat's mystical rule of the Republic. Baccio promised God he would become a friar himself if his life were spared. He survived only to see his hero tried, hanged, and burnt at the stake in 1498. He had once painted a portrait of Savonarola as a prophet. Now chastened by his vow, Baccio donned the cowl of a Dominican and withdrew from making art for a number of years.

The Vision of Saint Bernard marks Fra Bartolomeo's return to art in 1504. The friar was commissioned to paint it as an altarpiece for a nobleman's private chapel. In this work he brings to the subject matter an austerity of style that is reflective not only of Savonarola's views on sacred art, but those of Saint Bernard as well.

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153) was the dynamo behind the Cistercian reform, a movement within the Benedictine family to return to the rigours of its primitive rule. A theologian, a judge, a diplomat, and preacher, a poet, a mystic, and an advocate of Marian devotion, Bernard left his imprint on art history by disagreeing with the sumptuousness advocated by Abbot Suger whose monastery chapel of Saint Denis on the outskirts of Paris exemplified the new dazzling effects of Gothic art and architecture. Suger believed that only the finest embellishments were worthy of sacred space, and he decorated his sanctuary with golden vessels, stained glass, carved capitals, tapestries, and lustrous vestments. Suger felt that more is better' But Bernard found such finery a distraction to the contemplative soul, stunting the imagination and making it passive before the dazzling effects of art. For Bernard, then, less was better for the soul, and he advocated a kind of artistic minimalism that could prompt, but not derail, a prayerful monk toward contemplation of things beyond the material world. In the Cistercian monasteries, clear glass was preferred over stained-glass windows, silver was substituted for gold vessels, walls and vestments were unadorned. One could go so far as to say that Bernard presaged the aesthetics of Protestantism, the Enlightenment, and Modernism, as early as the twelfth century. But one thing is clear: in their advocacy for a sobriety and noble simplicity in art, qualities that would enkindle devotion and reverence in the viewer, Savonarola and Bernard were kindred spirits. Fra Bartolomeo's painting reflects this.

When he was the prior of San Marco, Savonarola created visual images in his homilies to great effect, and he encouraged those Dominicans not gifted in oral preaching to pursue the study of the plastic arts in order that they might preach visually in ways that could distil complex theological ideas into beautiful and simple images. It was his idea that God and man ought to communicate through art, but it was art's role to be pure and chaste in this sa­cred venture, and be free of all useless artifice and ornamentation.

Bartolomeo's rendition of Saint Bernard's vision of the Virgin Mary is far less fussy than an earlier version of the subject painted by Filippino Lippi in 1485. The Dominican has anchored the right side of his painting with three saintly figures standing before a landscape: Benedict, whose ideals Bernard sought to rekindle; John the Apostle, whose custody of the Virgin Mary was mandated from the cross (a miniature scene depicting the crucifixion is included here as a painterly footnote); and the kneeling Bernard, who preferred the spiritual inspiration found in nature to that found in the dusty tomes of monastic libraries. The stigmatisation of Saint Francis of Assisi and his meeting with Saint Dominic are tiny visual quotations lost in the decorative hills behind these three figures. But the overwhelming majesty of the Madonna and child borne aloft by angels on the transcendental left-hand side of the painting accentuates the fact that Bernard's vision was the product of an intense and direct contemplation of the Mother of God, using no artifice as its springboard. In fact, the sensuality that Bernard disclaimed in the material decoration of Suger's church is ironically surpassed by the sensuality that arises in some of his own mystical visions.

For instance, a more common iconographic motif of Bernard's apparition of the Virgin is based on an ecstatic encounter that happened to him in Speyer Cathedral in 1146. In that vision, Bernard beseeched Mary to be his mother too, and it is recorded that the Virgin took her breast and expressed her milk onto his lips, fortifying the eloquence of his preaching. This imagery is known as "The Lactation of Saint Bernard", and it became more popular than the staid vision depicted here by Baccio. If such flamboyant phantasms are a by-product of monastic austerity, it was not Fra Bartolomeo's aim to imitate it. His noble restraint in this painting can be attributed squarely to Savonarola's proprietary influence on his work. Later, however, Dominicans of the more extravagant Baroque era borrowed that popular lactation motif from the Cistercians and applied it visually to their equally eloquent founder, Saint Dominic, proving that while artistic styles come and go and reforming influences wax and wane, a good story can be shared, and it lasts for ever.
Fr. Michael Morris, O.P.
Professor, Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology, Berkeley, CA, USA.
To view this masterpiece in greater detail, visit: www.magnificat.com
MAGNIFICAT: The Art Essay of the month. August 2012

John 6:51-58. I am the living bread that came down from heaven... Homily Fr. Raymond




Sunday, 19 August 2012

Twentieth Sunday in Ordinary Time - Year B

Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 6:51-58.
I am the living bread that came down from heaven; 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Raymond . . .
Sent: Sunday, 19 August 2012, 16:01
Subject: 

SUNDAY 20B           
Jesus said to the crowd “I am the Living Bread which has come down from Heaven.  Anyone who eats this bread will live for ever.”  We can note from this wonderful saying, first of all, that Jesus is speaking directly and explicitly of himself.  He is not speaking about some  sign or symbol of himself.  He is not speaking about somerepresentation of himself.  He is speaking purely and simply, and very explicitly, ofhimself; his own true, living self:  “I.... am the Living Bread”.  And then he tells us where He comes from, “I am the Living Bread which has come down from Heaven”   So, He immediately leads us into mystery, the great mystery, of the Son of God’s Incarnation and of his Sacramental Communion with us; His communion with all who can find the faith to believe in Him; His promised communion with all who have the humility and the courage to believe in the truth of his words; even though, like the apostles, when they first heard them, they just couldn’t understand them.  “This is a hard saying”, the crowd said “and who can believe it”, but the Apostles said “To whom shall we go?  It’s you who have the words of eternal life”.  This faith of the apostles is faith in Jesus at its deepest.  It is not to be defined as a faith in the truth of what Jesus says or in the power he displays in his miracles, but it is purely and simply a faith in Jesus;  a faith that trusts itself to him no matter what he says, no matter what he does; and indeed, eventually it would prove to be a faith  and a trust in him no matter what might happen to him.

The next thing we can note in these words is that he calls himself “Bread”, “I am The Living Bread”.  For the Jews of his day, as for ourselves to this day, the word “Bread” conjures up the idea of mankind’s basic need for subsistence.  Man must eat to live.  In calling himself “Bread” therefore, Jesus is implying that our very life depends on him; our very subsistence depends on our communion with him.  He puts this very explicitly in another phrase: “If you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man you cannot have life in you”.    The Sacrament of Holy Communion then is something that is much more than just a gift to us.  It is of course a gift, a most wonderful gift, a gift beyond price, but, for the life of our souls, for our life in the spirit, it is also so much more than just a gift.  It is an absolute necessity.  It is an absolute necessity for us if we are to stay alive at all.  “If you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man you cannot have life in you”.

We are not, all of us, capable of great spritual insights  into the riches of the eucharist.  We are not, all of us, capable of deep theological understanding of the mysteries of our faith.  We are not, all of us, capable of rising to the heights of great spirituality.  But we are, each and every one of us, no matter what our spiritual stature before God, we are all able to come to the table of the Eucharist and “take and eat” as the Lord commanded us.
“Do this in memory of me”
 


Saturday 18 August 2012

Poem-homily for Vigil of the Assumption. Fr. Edward, Iceland


Ephesus House The exterior view
of the restored house, now serving as a chapel.


Dear, Fr. Edward,
Thank you for Afterview to Assumption Vigil.
It is a long way from Iceland to” That was the situation John knew as exiled to Patmos, being present at her Assumption. Probably he alone was present then at Seljuk.”
The names of John and Seljuk and Patmos place the Dormition of Mary - more securely than at least two places in Jerusalem.
How does Google Earth clarify the geography locations..
Your poem reaches beyond to the “above all spiritual Creatures, she was populating the heavens with the rising wave of heroic Chosen all divinized into its rest.
In Dno,
Donald

----- Forwarded Message -----
From:
 edward ...
To:
 Donald ...
Sent:
 Friday, 17 August 2012, 22:55
Subject:
 Poem-homily for Vigil of the Assumption

Dear Donald,

This is a little speculative, but I hope that you will find it acceptable.
Could you give a copy to H...?
Thank you!
Blessings in Domino,
fr Edward O.P.
... Stykkishólmur, Iceland.

Assumption Vigil – an Afterview

At the beginning
with Herod's menaces to the life of Jesus at Bethlehem,
Joseph took Jesus and Mary by night to Egypt;
they settled among Egyptians, Greeks and Romans.
At her life's end, with John she was again on pagan soil:
taken by John from Jerusalem to just outside Ephesus,
to an outlying village of Seljuk,
their house remains much repaired, a centre of pilgrimage.
Ephesus itself had been a centre of pagan worship to their goddess Diana.
What had brought John and Mary there to the Romanized province of Asia
is not known.
There must have been a personal link, Christian or Jewish:
probably a Christian scholar, and converted through an earlier contact
perhaps in Jerusalem.
They must have lived in obscurity,
probably known well only to a few as in Old Cairo.
Already in the Apocalyptic vision John is reminded twenty years later
of a Golden Age of the Ephesus church at the beginning
from which it had fallen. and to which it must return through penance (Ap 2,6-7).
He is also shown Mary's present place
begetting the Church in travail and actual danger:
she a compassionate viewer in her state of Assumption,
watching from a desert alone on the earth, but “reigning” in Heaven.
She was assumed there and the dragon expelled, cast down on the earth;
she with the angelical hierarchies matching his power
in a situation of conflict (ib 12,1-17)
That was the situation John knew as exiled to Patmos,
being present at her Assumption.
Probably he alone was present then at Seljuk
observing her Ascent so far and so long as it was possible:
the single- and great-minded handmaid of the Lord
raised to companionship with her Son;
he saw body and soul disposing themselves to the call from Above
in their final and complete transfer,
absorbed and divinely fulfilled into the glory of
triumphant spiritual labour where,
above all spiritual Creatures,
she was populating the heavens with the rising wave of heroic Chosen Ones
all divinized into its rest.

Stykkishólmur
17 August 2012


Friday 17 August 2012

On the Assumption of Mary by St. Alphonsus de Liguori

http://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/The%20Assumption%20by%20St.%20Alphonsus.html 
Many thanks, Kieran.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Kieran ...
To: Donald ...
Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2012, 18:23
Subject: The Gift of Miracles

http://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/The%20Assumption%20by%20St.%20Alphonsus.html

God bless
Kieran 

The Assumption by St. Alphonsus
The Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary 
Discourse VII: On the Assumption of Mary
by St. Alphonsus de Liguori
On this day the Church proposes to us to celebrate two solemn observances in honor of Mary: one, her happy departure from this earth; the other, her glorious assumption into heaven. In the present discourse we shall speak of her departure from this earth, and in the next of her assumption.

How precious was the death of Mary! 1st, On account of the special graces which attended it; 2d, On account of the manner of it.

Death being the punishment of sin, it would seem that the divine mother, all holy and exempt from every stain, should not be subject to death, nor suffer the same misfortune as the children of Adam, who are infected by the poison of sin. But God, wishing Mary in all things to be like to Jesus, required, as the Son had died, that the mother should also die; and because He wished to give to the just an example of the blessed death prepared for them, He decreed that the Virgin should die, but by a sweet and happy death. Hence we will enter upon the consideration, how precious was the death of Mary. 1st. On account of the special graces by which it was accompanied. 2d. On account of the manner in which it took place.

Point First.--Three things render death bitter, namely, attachment to earth, remorse for sin, and the uncertainty of salvation. But the death of Mary was entirely free from any such causes of bitterness, and was attended by many circumstances which rendered it precious and joyful. She died as she had always lived, entirely detached from all earthly things; she died in the most perfect peace of conscience; she died in the certainty of eternal glory.

Thursday 16 August 2012

COMMENT: HE AND i



from Biographical Sketch of Gabrielle Bossis  

  

He and i - Gabrielle Bossis

"Each soul is my favourite" says the Voice, "I choose some only to reach the others."


"Take care in setting down My words," says the Voice, "so that what springs from My heart may belight and joy easy to capture..." Having done this, I can only hope and trust that the reader may find what I have found in these pages - what the Voice describes as "a never-ending beginning again of the joy of hearing Me".
 from Preface. E.M.B.

Wednesday 15 August 2012

HE AND i Gabrielle Bossis quote for Assumption day



It has been an eventful day.
The Abbey of Sancta Maria, Nunraw, has the Patronal title of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin of Mary.
Dom Richard, the Abbot of  Roscrea our affiliations abbey, is with in the regular visit of the community.
The usual Solemn Vespers was followed with Benediction of  Blessed Sacrament.
A thought, 'Mary had a faith ...' for the day of Assumption.



December 24 1940
-
 I was reading, 'Mary had a faith that no other human being will ever have'.
 "All that a mother has also belongs to her children. Have you ever met a mother who refused toshare? She gives you everything if you ask her. Everything! So grow rich through her, for My glory,My poor little girl."